Yeah, It's the one Tomcat. We have 4GB RAM on production Server and We run it
with 1GB.
The version Tomcat is "Apache Tomcat/6.0.18".
Also, We're working with Lucene but I'm not sure that the problem is here.
We're looking Server Status from Apache Web Server and We have many keepalive
connect
Hi,
> Elli,
>
> On 11/4/2009 7:01 PM, Elli Albek wrote:
>> I also
>> remember that closing a connection closes statements and result sets, but it
>> has been a while since I read the source.
>
> Pooled connections are almost certainly not behaving this way. This has
> been discussed at least twice
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 02/11/2009 10:06, S Arvind wrote:
>
>> Hi Tomcat developers,
>>
>>Bascially my requirement is ability to control the session
>> sharing in browser. Till now we maintained each application as differnet
>> context but pointing to same doc-
i don't suppose you've had time to look at the test case?
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Just to make sure w.r.t. it being working in Jetty: You use the same
> Java version? Sun changed an important bit between Java 5 and Java 6,
> where they are now caching something detec
Barry, that's a normal console message when using the DataSource. :)
Alright. I have a question. I've finished up the ConnectionPool wrapper
class that I found and is being used. I don't need it to run, but I figured
it's there why not modify it to handle EVERYTHING dealing with connections.
W
you're going to want to trap the stack and heap parameters with all the tools
chuck mentioned
you're going to want to note which webapps are being loaded and where (do you
have a cluster)
track ALL the resource changes you make specifically Database resources which
can consume unrestricted heap
> From: Joan Monplet Ortega [mailto:j...@solostocks-int.com]
> Subject: SEVERE: All threads (700) are currently busy, waiting.
> Increase maxThreads (700) or check the servlet status
>
> We have Apache Web Server & Tomcat 6.x, both are connected throws
> mod_proxy_ajp.
Exact Tomcat version, pleas
> From: Johnson, Trevin (Contractor)
> [mailto:trevin.john...@occ.treas.gov]
> Subject: RE: Tomcat Memory and Garbage Collection questions...
>
> I see odd behavior. Our tomcat setting is set for a max memory setting
> of 256Mb in our Development Environment. Yet it goes over 256Mb. Up to
> 290Mb.
Joan Monplet Ortega wrote:
SEVERE: All threads (700) are currently busy, waiting. Increase
maxThreads (700) or check the servlet status
That sounds like a lot of threads.
And we checked all servlets and we are sure that all cursors to database
are closed (statement, resultset, etc...).
Y
Pivo wrote:
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Piavlo [mailto:lolitus...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: howto setup url security constraint with parameters?
The problem is that does not work for user dirs
defined with org.apache.catalina.startup.UserConfig
Sounds like a bug, but I haven't looke
Michael C wrote:
Andre,
From what I'm able to remember, that's amazing!
..
Waow. I can already see the long-distance credits piling up here.
I can feel the QOS increasing, the Hops decreasing along with the
Latency, and the TTL just shifted left one place.
-
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Piavlo [mailto:lolitus...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: howto setup url security constraint with parameters?
>>
>> The problem is that does not work for user dirs
>> defined with org.apache.catalina.startup.UserConfig
>>
>
> Sounds like a bug, but I haven't
I see odd behavior. Our tomcat setting is set for a max memory setting of 256Mb
in our Development Environment. Yet it goes over 256Mb. Up to 290Mb. I assumed
that it would never go over 256Mb in task manager. Is that correct?
thanks
Answers Below as well...
-Original Message-
From: Ca
Michael C wrote:
Chuck,
I fully agree about IE but the people in charge don't wanna hear it.
The fact that this is a third party tomcat install confuses me even
more than if it was normal, and definitely frustrating that the logs
could be anywhere. If we pretend I did have a normal install, are
Andre,
>From what I'm able to remember, that's amazing! Also I will check all
of those places as soon as I'm allowed back on. I'm almost certain
server.XML contains 8080.
-Mike
On Thursday, November 5, 2009, André Warnier wrote:
> Michael C wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> I can't get to the server at th
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> I fully agree about IE but the people in charge don't wanna hear it.
I didn't mean for everyone, just for your testing until things are sorted.
> If we pretend I did have a normal insta
Hi,
We have Apache Web Server & Tomcat 6.x, both are connected throws
mod_proxy_ajp.
We have one instance Tomcat and different appBase (webapps).
We have a fatal problem, our Tomcat throws the next exception:
SEVERE: All threads (700) are currently busy, waiting. Increase
maxThreads
Thank you for the information you provided.
I had totally missed the point that JMX proxy servlet can also be used to
specific attributes of the exposed MBeans.
Yes, we do have apache in front of the tomcat container as well as firewalls
as part of our infrastructure. I was still looking for best
Chuck,
I fully agree about IE but the people in charge don't wanna hear it.
The fact that this is a third party tomcat install confuses me even
more than if it was normal, and definitely frustrating that the logs
could be anywhere. If we pretend I did have a normal install, are
there any extra ste
Michael C wrote:
Chuck,
I can't get to the server at the moment but I'm an absolute noob. The
way I know it doesn't work is that when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen that comes up with version
5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed. As soon as I am allowed, I'll
check the log
Am Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:42:58 + schrieb Anurag Kapur
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> > Separating JMX Proxy from manager won't be very helpful because JMX
> > Proxy itself is offering control over tomcat. And it needs direct
> > access to MBeans of Tomcat's JVM.
> My
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen
> that comes up with version 5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed.
Sounds like you're using IE as your browser; if so, I'd stro
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
Subject: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
Tomcat no longer works.
Care to tell us what that means? Log entries, error messages, anything useful?
Or do we have to call Pid to get him to use his Internet Tele
Chuck,
I can't get to the server at the moment but I'm an absolute noob. The
way I know it doesn't work is that when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen that comes up with version
5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed. As soon as I am allowed, I'll
check the log files (which I hope
Thanx for the log4j hint!
I'had only listed the libs. The most difficult thing is to explain some
"ancient" developers (they wrote the webservices) that sometimes they should
change the old library!
I'll try to put all libraries except from commons-logging and log4j into the
shared libs
Michele
On
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> Tomcat no longer works.
Care to tell us what that means? Log entries, error messages, anything useful?
Or do we have to call Pid to get him to use his Internet Telepathy?
- Chuck
THIS
Hi all,
I’m using a program called EMC Smarts which is a network monitoring
tool. It can accommodate a web interface using Tomcat, which is
currently version 5.5.28 and works perfectly. I am trying to upgrade
to version 6.0.20 but am having some trouble. Smarts official
documentation for Tomcat
OK, not identical. But they are the same linux version and have the same
versions of all of the software that I'm using. Obviously there is some
difference between them.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 3:
Oh yeahgood point..I likely don't have many (I have a few) DB errors
printing to the console.
Fortunately, I've shored that area up greatly.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:52 PM
To: Tomcat User
> From: Propes, Barry L [mailto:barry.l.pro...@citi.com]
> Subject: RE: ConnectionPool question
>
> When I FIRST make a DB query through one of my JSPs/servlets, I get
> this msg printed to the console.
>
> AbandonedObjectPool is used
> (org.apache.commons.dbcp.abandonedobjectp...@b32627)
>Lo
When I FIRST make a DB query through one of my JSPs/servlets, I get this msg
printed to the console.
AbandonedObjectPool is used (org.apache.commons.dbcp.abandonedobjectp...@b32627)
LogAbandoned: true
RemoveAbandoned: true
RemoveAbandonedTimeout: 30
I don't get it afterwards, possibl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
On 11/5/2009 1:44 PM, Hehl, Thomas wrote:
> OK, but these servers are all identical. Why would one do this and the
> rest not?
Your previous statement seems to be in conflict with your observations.
Something must be different: kernel versio
Thank you for your reply.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Tobias Crefeld wrote:
> Am Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:04:06 +
> schrieb Anurag Kapur :
>
> > 1. Why is it considered that the manager webapp should not be
> > deployed on production environments? Am I just believing a rumour
> > here or doe
I'm not sure about commons-logging, but log4j is definitely not
share-safe.
I tried it, and in our case, ended up with messages from different
webapps interleaving in "seemingly random" log files. That might have
had more to do with how my developers were using log4j than the library
itself, but
OK, but these servers are all identical. Why would one do this and the
rest not?
I don't have direct access to this server, but will try what you
suggest.
-Original Message-
From: Mikolaj Rydzewski [mailto:m...@ceti.pl]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Sub
Hehl, Thomas wrote:
What I don't understand is that every time someone hits our site, tomcat
spawns several more processes and they never go away. This same tomcat
and webapp are currently running on nearly 40 servers and they all only
have two processes except this one that spawns about 8 proces
36 matches
Mail list logo
