depends on the implemented Bean type
http://openejb.apache.org/examples.html
let us know..
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene E
how do you accomodate multi-mb size files?
Martin Gainty
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidentialité
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine M
"Christopher Schultz" wrote in message
news:4a32c4e3.6060...@christopherschultz.net...
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Anthony,
>
> On 6/12/2009 1:47 PM, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
>> Well, they used to be static JS files, then we decide we wanted more
>> flexibility in the c
I had come around the problem by reinstalling everything included Vista. I
hadn't found out where the problem came from but now I can use my webapp. My
only guess is there was some troubles with the network because I already had
to reset it for avoiding white pages...
Thanks everyone for your help
>>
>> Yes, and I think that with keep-
>>alive off, apache should not chunk >>(or at least give the option to) since
it knows I am closing the
>>connection
>>right after the response is finished.
>I suggest using the environment
>variables downgrade-1.0 and
>nokeepalive,
>maybe also no-
Dave wrote:
> We have an ear file with one entity ejb jar, one session ebj jar, and two web
> modules that use a common library: common.jar.
>
> Where to put the common.jar in the ear file? Thanks.
Tomcat doesn't support ear files. You have the wrong forum for your
question.
Mark
-
We have an ear file with one entity ejb jar, one session ebj jar, and two web
modules that use a common library: common.jar.
Where to put the common.jar in the ear file? Thanks.
Dave
On 13.06.2009 14:51, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 12.06.2009 17:48, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
>>> Rainer Jung:
>>>
On 12.06.2009 10:43, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> No, it's not strange at all. If the length of the response body is
>>> not
> known when the response headers are sent, you obviou
On 12.06.2009 17:48, Anthony J. Biacco wrote:
>> Rainer Jung:
>>
>>> On 12.06.2009 10:43, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
No, it's not strange at all. If the length of the response body is
>> not
known when the response headers are sent, you obviously can't add a
Content-Length header. That