Re: Tomcat Exception

2006-11-24 Thread Gaurav Kushwaha
Did you try your web app in a different installation of Tomcat ? I think your Tomcat installation is messed up. On 11/25/06, nayabinghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I recently deployed a application and on startup Tomcat throws the exception below. I have posted this in java forum thinking it i

Re: Realms

2006-11-24 Thread Asare Samuel
Thank you for your speedly reply. Let me get this straight are you saying you can't access the login page directly and that the only thing that should be accessed directly is the item (ie page)your are protecting. If so, you have hit the nail on the head. I am currently allowing the user t

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Rainer Jung
Yes, apache has an easy way of building additional modules, once you have build your apache. It uses a little perl script named apxs in apache's bin directory. mod_jk uses the same procedure. Things get difficult, if you get apache as a binary distribution and later try to use apxs to build. Then

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread William Bonnet
Hi What's the story on Solaris? You need to buy C Compiler? I think they have some Developer's Studio, but I haven't checked licensing. gnu gcc works great on solaris And Sun Studio 11 can be freely downloaded fron Sun's website Regards William -- William http://ww

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
I found this while I was digging around. http://forum.sun.com/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=96761&tstart=30 Ben On 11/24/06, Steve Ochani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Date sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: Nikola Milutinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:

Re: OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Steve Ochani
Date sent: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:26:34 -0800 (PST) From: Nikola Milutinovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk To: Tomcat Users List Send reply to: Tomcat Users List > > Installing from s

OT: Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Nikola Milutinovic
> Installing from source is super simple. It's a pretty basic "untar, > configure, make, install" kinda package, and always results in the > binary that is appropriate for your setup. You just need to make sure > that you have a C compiler handy (which, as I recall, Solaris does not > always have).

Re: Realms

2006-11-24 Thread olivier nouguier
hi, You are using the FORM authentication scheme! This scheme imply that: 1: a secured resource is accessed. 2: login (error-page) is given 3: login occures 4: secured resource (1) is given (with a GET !) 408 error code may occurs if: a - login page is access directly ( starting at stage 2). b

Tomcat Exception

2006-11-24 Thread nayabinghi
I recently deployed a application and on startup Tomcat throws the exception below. I have posted this in java forum thinking it is development is but I was told it looks like a Tomcat issue. Any assistance with this will be greatly appreciated. INFO | jvm 1 | 2006/11/20 09:10:58 | SEVERE: Begi

Realms

2006-11-24 Thread Asare Samuel
I have put a realm on a page on one of my Html pages using the FORM based realm. 1-sometimes i get this message: message HTTP Status 408 - The time allowed for the login process has been exceeded. If you wish to continue you must either click back twice and re-click the link you reques

Re: Tomcat is sometimes very slow using mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Henk Fictorie
Yes, I know. Originally I wrote that because of the observed Headers with LiveHTTPHeaders in Mozilla. I didn't realize that Transfer-Encoding is an Hop-To-Hop header which was stripped by our proxy-server. Later during snooping I also noticed that this header wasn't send by Tomcat through the AJP

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
Chris, Are these not binary releases then? http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/ On 11/24/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Chris, > > Um, a good question.

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Chris, > > Um, a good question. I thought that mod_jk was only available as > source and pkg_get -i ap2_mod_jk seemed like an easier option. Altough > it turned out to be a headache. > > If i get time I might try out the bina

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread ben short
Chris, Um, a good question. I thought that mod_jk was only available as source and pkg_get -i ap2_mod_jk seemed like an easier option. Altough it turned out to be a headache. If i get time I might try out the binary from apache. Ben On 11/24/06, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Solaris 10 Apache 2 Tomcat mod_jk

2006-11-24 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben, ben short wrote: > Rainer, > After looking at the package on the blastwave site i noticed it has > Apache 2.2 prefork MPM as a dependancy. Why are you using a 3rd-party distribution of mod_jk instead of the official one? I didn't even though 3r

Re: Refreshing tomcat webapp class loader

2006-11-24 Thread Leon Rosenberg
you can write your own, its pretty simple, and do whatever you want. in your context.xml regards Leon On 11/24/06, asaf.lahav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Isn't it possible to simply make the class loader reload all the jars in its classpath? It is possible to replace the main webapp c