I've used a messy kludge in situations like this. Messy... kludgy but
it /does/ work. =) The gist of the idea is that you render your form
fields like normal, using the list edit. You also render a @Hidden field
(make sure to set the "encode" property to false). Now you use DOM to add
your fiel
That would be an awesome tool. I've been thinking about some sort of
utility along those lines, especially since I've been revamping a ton of
templates in the last few days (to use less ognl)... it would probably be
worth my time to create something like this... at the very least some sort
of "dyna
hm... won't work.
Consider:
ognl:visit.user.login
Suppose that you're using tap4 and visit is an abstract method, injected
in. You'll get an exception since the method is abstract. Suppose you use
the abstract instantiator that howard wrote to instaniate the
page/component class. Fine... now you'll
> I have always felt that the only true way to test is live.
Certainly. :) Such a tool would in no way eliminate the need to live
testing. It would merely (hopefully) cut down on typos. ;)
Consider, for example, my recent set of refactoring I did.
A lot of stuff like:
ognl:visit.user.login
got cut
Baz
Robert
> Hello there! I've searched the list I got very surprised on how many
> questions about this subject, and how many psychedelic answers.
> Is there an easy (hack free) way to add a checkbox to a table
> component? Is there a good example? Would there be a good soul to give
> it
1)Tapestry will normally render whatever you put, so there's no issue with
having the button w/out a jwcid attribute. That's barking up the wrong
tree.
2)The error that you're getting when you put jwcid says that the component
is in an ignored block of text.
Here are some examples of ignored blocks
Note that "getInvoker" is a 4.x idiom. If you're using tapestry 3.x, you
want the "getInserter()" method (deprecated in favor of getInvoker in
4.0). You can also do interesting things like:
and then your block can do something like:
blockComponent.getInvoker() (or getInserter() for
3.x).getBindin
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:26:51AM +1000, Murray Collingwood wrote:
> When you are using the contrib:Table you specify the columns parameter for
> each column to
> appear in your table. I think you understand this but you haven't mentioned
> much detail.
>
> So, in Robert's example there are 3
Just thought I would mention, for all us maven newbies... I just found
this announcement (dated April 26 2006) about a free maven 2 book on TSS:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40126
The free maven 2 book mentioned there is still available.
Robert
> Hi there guys,
>
> Finna
My understanding is that tap4, internally, uses ognl much less than before.
In terms of binding properties, since tap4 lets you develop custom binding
mechanisms, you could always write your own replacement and plug it in.
But then, Howard's already done that. :) Take a look at
http://howardlewissh
Depending on the complexity of your confirmation dialog, you can do
something simple, too, like taking advantage of informal parameters. :)
Something like:
Purge
Robert
> Vinicius Carvalho wrote:
>> 1st: Is there an way to have an confirmation message for my
>> DirectLink? Like showing an confir
> On 5/9/06, linuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Henri. The code in the wiki(
>> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/PopupLinkSubmit) is not full,
>> can
>> you show the *PopupLinkSubmit.script*, *PopupLinkSubmit.jwc* and the
>> PopupDirectLink.java?
>
>
> Sorry, I forgot them. I have P
12 matches
Mail list logo
