Tapestry 5, Security, Services, ComponentClassResolver

2007-05-25 Thread jb
I am new to Tapestry 5 and got lost in IoC. I am trying to handle some security aspects in the RequestFilter. Therefore I wrote a test SecurityFilter class which implements RequestFilter and is registered by the ApplicationModule. Everything works well. But now I wonder how it is possible to f

Re: Tapestry 5, Security, Services, ComponentClassResolver

2007-05-26 Thread jb
I saw this request and I believe this could be helpful. Nevertheless I do not really understand how the complete service binding works. Is there a sample which shows how to gain access to internal tapestry services (like the ComponentClassResolver) because than I have a possible way "to work aro

T5 / redirect / https

2007-05-31 Thread jb
Hi to all Tapestry users, is there a "best practice" for redirect? I noticed in T4 there was a RedirectException. In T5 I got the redirect working just by setting response.sendRedirect(.getSimpleName()) in my filter. How is it possible to switch the channel from http to https together with the

Re: AW: Split mailing list for T5/T4,4.1

2007-06-15 Thread jb
I believe splitting is a real good idea. But if not than maybe it will make sense to mention the version in the subject? Jens - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T5.0.4: Bug in ComponentClassResolver?

2007-06-20 Thread jb
I noticed same strange behaviour in the site/class mapping of the ComponentClassResolver. If the Classname contains text wich is identical to directories where the class is in than the text is not contained in the key of the map entry. For example: /mysite/admin/AdminLogin becomes /mysite/admin

RE: T5.0.4: Bug in ComponentClassResolver?

2007-06-25 Thread jb
ok, I see. Thanks Ben for this important information. But what happens, for example if I have the following structure: 2) pages.login.admin.AdminLogin 2) pages.login.UserLogin I have not tried but I guess the second one becomes: login/User, which is reasonable. But what about the first: "login/?