t5c-commons

2011-06-14 Thread gs_tapestry
Hi, I am trying to upgrade to Tapestr5.2.5. But the t5c-commons (5.0.18) component i am using is not compatible to 5.2.5. My application failed to start up due to java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tapestry5/internal/services/RequestPathOptimizer. If I remove the Maven dependence on this

Re: t5c-commons

2011-06-14 Thread gs_tapestry
I didn't know that. I will start investigation on chenillekit then. Thanks. Simon -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/t5c-commons-tp4488135p4489247.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-13 Thread gs_tapestry
Hello, I am migrating from T5.0 to T5.2. It's such a pain. This is the latest error that drives me crazy. Caused by: org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException: Failure parsing template context:search/AdvancedSearch.tml: Block parameters are only allowed directly within component e

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-14 Thread gs_tapestry
It's just an expression of frustration. I already experienced quite a lot issues in this migration (not trying to say it's Tapestry's fault ). Anyway, thanks for respond to my post. I was able to by pass the original issue and encounter another one. Exception assembling embedded component 'abc

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-14 Thread gs_tapestry
This is very helpful information not just for this issue. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Another-case-of-Block-parameters-are-only-allowed-directly-within-component-elements-tp4585262p4587195.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive a

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-14 Thread gs_tapestry
Never meant to complain and definitely no intention to insult. If it's perceived that way, my apologies. In component search.dynamicAdvancedSearchForm (mentioned as ABCAdvancedSearchForm previously) it's as @Parameter private boolean itemsFound; In the containing component class AdvancedSe

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-15 Thread gs_tapestry
I am using T5.2.5 too. I can't reproduce it with your code either. Might be something else in the application as it is T5.0 based. Any major change in T5.2 has particular demand in component parameter? Thanks, Simon -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Another-

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-15 Thread gs_tapestry
Here are the stack. Thanks. EMM 54968 [http-9080-4] ERROR org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.Registry - [ 5] Assembling component search/Advanced:advancedsearchcomponent.advancedsearchform.dynamicadvancedsearchform (com.gallery.components.search.DynamicAdvancedSearchForm) EMM 54968 [http-9080-4] ERROR org.

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-15 Thread gs_tapestry
Thanks for getting back so quick. Yes I am using T5.2.5. I will give T5.3 a try during the weekend and have you posted. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Another-case-of-Block-parameters-are-only-allowed-directly-within-component-elements-tp4585262p4591835.ht

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-18 Thread gs_tapestry
Hi Thiago, Wish you had a good weekend. Sorry for the lose of Brazilian national soccer team. I spent a few hours trying upgrade to T.5.3.0. While starting application, i got error "java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tapestry5/internal/services/ResourceCache". I searched and found both Ho

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-18 Thread gs_tapestry
I checked my application. It doesn't have any direct reference to ResourceCache and it compiled without error. Regarding the mixed Tapestry JAR, I did run into such issue at the beginning of migration from T5.0. Below are related maven dependence. Do you see any potential issue?

Re: Another case of "Block parameters are only allowed directly within component elements."

2011-07-18 Thread gs_tapestry
I modified the three places you mentioned (and excluded transitive dependencies) and fresh build my application. I am still getting the same error during application start. Below is the trace. I could not figure out which piece caused the issue. Thanks. EMM 19515 [main] INFO org.springframework

A TAP5-586 alike issue ?

2011-12-30 Thread gs_tapestry
Hi, I am trying to upgrade from 5.0 to 5.2.6 and run into an issue. After loading my page (at the end of message), the line # advancedSearch is rendered differently in T5.0 and T5.2.6 In T5.0, which it has been working, rendered as # Advanced Search In T5.2.6 which gives error, ren

Re: A TAP5-586 alike issue ?

2011-12-30 Thread gs_tapestry
= Sorry I have to re-post my message as some lines on the top of my post are messed up == Hi, I am trying to upgrade from 5.0 to 5.2.6 and run into an issue. After loading my page (at the end of message), the line # advancedSearch is rendered differently in T5.0 and T5.2.6 In

A TAP5-586 alike issue ?

2011-12-30 Thread gs_tapestry
Hi I am trying to upgrade from 5.0 to 5.2.6 and run into an issue. After loading my page (at the end of message), the line “ # advancedSearch ” is rendered differently in T5.0 and T5.2.6 In T5.0, which it has been working, rendered as “ # Advanced Search ” In T5.2.6 which gives error, r

Object [object Object] has no method 'attachEvent'

2012-01-03 Thread gs_tapestry
I guess most people still in holiday mood :-). Happy new year to everyone ! Let me try this again. Hopefully someone had experience with my issue. Thanks in advance, Simon -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/A-TAP5-586-alike-issue-tp5110620p5116997.html Sent

Switch Locale with cookie disabled

2012-04-05 Thread gs_tapestry
Hi, I am customizing an Tapestry 5.1 based application to make it SEO compliant. We have a working switch locale function. We use PersistentLocale in our implementation. Since PersistentLocale is Cookie-based, it stops working when we disable browser cookie ( a requirement for SEO). My questio

RE: Switch Locale with cookie disabled

2012-04-05 Thread gs_tapestry
with cookie disabled On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:25:06 -0300, gs_tapestry <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi, Hi! > I am customizing an Tapestry 5.1 based application to make it SEO > compliant. We have a working switch locale function. We use > PersistentLocale in our >