It seems that t:if considers 0.1, 0.99 as false, but 1.0 as true.
Should I file a bug? This is 5.0.18
-james
--
James A. Hillyerd
Hi Kalle,
I can't recommend for, or against, jSecurity because back in April it
didn't quite fit my needs (http://www.jsecurity.org/node/1031).
However, I do think they're on the right track. Since then (April)
they've gone into the Apache incubator. I intend to review it again
soon.
For the record, I've succeeded in getting Jetty-T5-OpenEJB-Hibernate
working. It's a great combination for development and it has resulted
in JumpStart 4.0. I'll post the announcement tomorrow if there are no
glitches reported in the next 24 hours.
On 22/11/2008, at 10:35 AM, Geoff Callen
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Martijn Brinkers
wrote:
> But I'm using run-jetty-run successfully for a long time already. I only
> had to add -Dorg.mortbay.jetty.webapp.parentLoaderPriority=true to the
> VM-arguments box in the run-jetty-run debug configuration (in Eclipse)
It still doesn't wo
I would prefer a prototypical community application to start the usual
webapp.
So user management, registration with email validation and capchas,
profiles, user groups, fine grained security, optionally simplistic blogs,
forums, pm's and a bit of content management etc. I tend to copy that stuff
I completely agree too. A search facility of the existing site would
be a huge leap forward.
On 16/01/2009, at 9:23 AM, Szemere Szemere wrote:
Completely agree with the sentiments expressed. Too often I've had
to use
Google or similar to find what I'm looking for in the Tapestry
documentati
Hi James,
I don't think it is an issue with the if-component. If-component just
calls a method that is given in the test-attribute and evaluates whether
it returns true or false. Could it be that in this method you
accidencially do an Integer comparison instead of a Float comparison?
Greetz nilleha
I had some problems with deploying my project and reading properties with
this example (developed on Jetty - OK!, but deployed on Tomcat, and reading
properties failed).
Solution was in Tapestry source code:
InputStream in =
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(re
Seems reasonable to me; the TypeCoercer is coercing Float to Integer
and checking for zero, and that's a lossy coercion that rounds down.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:59 AM, James Hillyerd wrote:
> It seems that t:if considers 0.1, 0.99 as false, but 1.0 as true.
> Should I file a bug? This i
Aaron, I was able to reproduce your fast/slow problem using every Tap
version from 4.1.1 up
to 4.1.6 (and relevent ognl versions) but only when
org.apache.tapestry.disable-caching was set to TRUE
Perhaps you forgot to set this property back to false ?
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Aaron Kamin
I would like to discard all changes for one strategy only.
PersistentFieldManager always iterates over all strategies when calling
discardChanges() and I don't see any (easy) way to decorate the
PersistentFieldManager to allow it to discard selectively for some
strategies only. Would it be possible
Hello Thiago,
sorry, the weekend happened to come in between. ;-)
> What value are you passing to the context field of
> LinkFactory.createComponentEventLink()?
> AFAIK, Tapestry always adds the current activation context to any links,
> unless you specify
> an activation context yourself. Try
12 matches
Mail list logo