hello, i would like to omit some part of my page eg. allow only one component
to be written in output. i did it writing my own MarkupWriter with
enable/disable function which when enabled works as standard writer and when
disabled ignores all writings. It's initially disabled and only specific
com
Hi Robert,
How to implement this component? Is it necessary to register the component
in the appmodule?
Thx
Sabine
Robert Zeigler wrote:
>
> Couple of comments...
> First, the T5 asset service has the md5 feature. But the default
> implementation, at the moment, only requires md5 hashin
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:32:06PM -0700, kael20 wrote:
> I have an issue where I need to create the style for a div based on the
> properties of an object in my database. This object contains top, left,
> width, and height which are important to create this particular div. Is
> there anyway that
I am looking forward to reading it.
2007/8/3, Nick Westgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is great news, BTW. Good luck with it!
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
>
>
> Kolesnikov, Alexander GNI wrote:
> > I am writing a book on T5 and the publisher is looking for technical
> > reviewers for this book.
> > Please
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:12:14AM -0500, Ben Dotte wrote:
> Is there any reason you can't use a threaded HiveMind service? That is
> usually the approach I take when I have a shared resource that should
> only live for the duration of a request.
Thanks for the tip. I'm not quite sure if this work
hi goeff,
it worked for me:
net.sf.tacos
tacos-core
4.1.0-SNAPSHOT
com.javaforge.tapestry
tapestry-prop
1.0.0
tapestry
tapestry
tapestry-annotations
tapestry
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:03:37 -0300, Francois Armand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Would a black list intead of a white list better? I suppose there are
less files to hide than files to allow access.
Well, I think that one of the best principle in security is
Hello Geoff,
We had the same trade offs for our system but still we prefer Hivemind
implementation of DI over EJB3 implementation, because of the
following reasons:
1. DI from Hivemind has better integration and less infrastructure
requirements - jetty much simpler than full blown EJB container.
2
BTW
Could you, Geoff, comment on how EJB 3 solve Hibernate detached object
multi-thread access problem? I didn't got your point in this case.
Renat
On 03/08/07, Geoff Callender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> I guess my starting point is that I really like the discipline of
> building
Hi, I would try blocks of components at the end of your template, and
a delegate component.
The delegate refers to a method in your page or component class the
template it for. It returns an Object, which is actually one of the
component blocks. It can also return null and nothing will be rendere
Thanks, but probably i don't explain well.
I already have Acegi with that configuration. My problem isn't the
login page but the response of the form in the login page. This form is
do a "post" to direct.svc and i cant give access to anonymous user to
the url: /direct.svc**
Paulo Ramos
Mart
Sorry I missed that.
Without investigating too much I can se you have 2 possibilities
1) Having a separate servlet/url for login (not that bad ...)
2) Doing your on ObjectDefinitionSOurce implementation returning
different config attributes depending on passed request (in filter
context this obje
Hi Kalle,
I guess my starting point is that I really like the discipline of
building a business facade for my system ie. a layer that says what
the system can do for you, irrespective of UIs. So then the question
for me is where to put that layer. Since EJB3 arrived, I've opted to
put t
Also, if you would like to put the logic to determine if a component should
display or not in that component, you can have your SetupRender or
BeginRender phases return a boolean result -- if it returns the false, the
component will not be rendered (no matter where that component is placed).
For
Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Would a black list intead of a white list better? I suppose there are
less files to hide than files to allow access.
Well, I think that one of the best principle in security is "explicit
authorization" : you just do not want that a confidential file is
access
Nope. Zero configuration necessary for the basic functionality.
Keep in mind, however, that the default configuration is pretty
restrictive, since
it is whitelist-based, and the only entries added by default are the
assets that
come "out of the box" with tapestry (tapestry.css, tapestry.js, e
I don't plan on changing the default configuration from whitelist to
blacklist... it's the fallback.
I'm a fan of "deny unless explicitly authorized", as well. The
AssetProtectionDispatcher
takes an ordered configuration of AssetPathAuthorizer's, with the
default whitelist implementation
bei
you have to configure your FilterSecurityInterceptor with something like this
/login.html**=ROLE_ANONYMOUS,ROLE_AUTHENTICATED
/**=ROLE_AUTHENTICATED
Yes, a threaded service is created and bound to the current request
thread the first time it is requested. There is a more detailed
explanation here:
http://hivemind.apache.org/hivemind1/services.html#Threaded+Service+Model
They also mention on there how to handle cleanup at the end of the
reques
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi!
I was wondering why the "_defaultTracker" in the Form component is marked
as @Persist not as @Persist("flash").
In my opinion it should be @Persist("flash")!!
Persisting the ValidationTracker in the session leads to some (usually)
not wanted
behaviour: the validation is not reset, even thou
Hi,
I've just tried beanform-core-0.8-20070629.194801-1.jar but I'm still
getting the problem. Anyone else?
[ +/- ] Exception: Unable to lookup $BeanFormButtons_31:
$BeanFormButtons_31
org.apache.hivemind.ApplicationRuntimeException
Unable to lookup $BeanFormButtons_31: $BeanFormButtons_3
Ok, yeah actually Tapestry's ApplicationServlet takes care of the
HiveMind filter so nevermind that part:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/usersguide/hivemind.html#Bootstrapping%20the%20Registry
On 8/3/07, Ben Dotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, a threaded service is created and bound t
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:11:23 -0300, Renat Zubairov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Main drawback is offcourse XML files, but we hope it will be fixed
with T5 IOC and/or HM2
Tapestry-IoC requires no XML files and is very easy and powerful. Most
people here already discovered the pleasure of Tape
Hi,
I have 3 projects and i decide group commons components and pages in one
library.
One of the pages is the Acegi login.
I have friendly url's and secure pages with Acegi.
When i try to login, the form is sent by "post" to direct.svc and fail
because this url is protected. How i can open the
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:33:55 -0300, Robert Zeigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Nope. Zero configuration necessary for the basic functionality.
Keep in mind, however, that the default configuration is pretty
restrictive, since
it is whitelist-based, and the only entries added by default are t
By making it @Persist (i.e. with default), then the container (i.e., your
page) can set a @Meta to control the default persistence of components below
it. Thus, if you want the default to be "flash", you're in luck. Or, you
can inject the Form component, it has methods that overlap
ValidationDele
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:07:07 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
By making it @Persist (i.e. with default), then the container (i.e., your
page) can set a @Meta to control the default persistence of components
below it. Thus, if you want the default to be "flash", you're in
One more question. What will happen with all nested components when a given
parent component returns false in its SetupRender? Are they automatically
discarded?
thanks,
jm.
DougS wrote:
>
> Also, if you would like to put the logic to determine if a component
> should display or not in that c
Hello all,
I'm trying to wrap my head around Tapestry. I'll be ordering some books
shortly but in the meantime: What is the simplest way (in 4.1) to show
a list of form validation errors. Here is the essence of my page:
Any components that are rendered by that component will not be rendered if
SetupRender or BeginRender returns false.
Janko Muzykant wrote:
>
> One more question. What will happen with all nested components when a
> given parent component returns false in its SetupRender? Are they
> automaticall
Yes thank you Nick.
I've create my own Any component from T5 5.0.3 sources ;)
Regards
In your form component,
> success="listener:doSubmit">
I think you meant jwcid="[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Also, you need to specify the delegate parameter.
In case you did not know, there is an example on
displaying all errors in chapter 3 of
Enjoying Web Development with Tapestry
http://www
33 matches
Mail list logo