First, we all know that tapestry is open source. But please don't forget
that a project cannot live without its "simple" users. You cannot simply
say that future users will outnumber the current users - first, you
cannot be sure and the most important is that potential future users
will think a
Norbert Sándor wrote:
> - rethink the IOC container of t5 (use hivemind 2.0 or maybe Spring
> instead of a custom "unsupported" solution)
I also agree that we shouldn't have another IoC container. Spring is the
de facto standard. Either take Spring and work around missing features.
E.g. use naming
Hi Ezra
You asked:
> I don't see how it relates to Tapestry.
It relates to Tapestry because it appears on your faq.
Option:
a) Remove it from the faq (pretend people are asking this question, or that
they are only
misguided fools like myself)
b) Fix the faq by providing a recommended soluti
James,
Does your PagingQueryResult returned by your DAO by any chance wrap a Hibernate
Criteria? Later the Criteria methods setMaxResults(),
setFirstResult(), addOrder() and list()
are invoked from the HibernateTableModel on request?
Or where do you invoke the criteria (or similar) methods?
Ma
I'm experiencing some issues with Tapestry 4.1 (the latest version from maven).
First is that I can't seem to get a listener called unless I have my
listener submit a form. If remove the submitForm attribute, theres no
indication on the server that a listener method is called.
click me
First of all, let me say that I don't appreciate the name-calling. I am not
personally attacking anyone here. I am a very active member of the open
source community and I too do it because I enjoy it. I enjoy working with
Tapestry and I believe that Tapestry is a very well-designed framework.
Th
tapestry is a open source project.
before you requires others do or not do something, think what you have
done for it.
don't selfish
2006/7/30, Michael Echerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Norbert Sándor wrote:
> - rethink the IOC container of t5 (use hivemind 2.0 or maybe Spring
> instead of a custom "
Can you file this under JIRA Josh? I'm a little busy on other things today
but will be able to look at it and find a fix (if one is to be had) on
Monday.
On 7/30/06, Josh Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm experiencing some issues with Tapestry 4.1 (the latest version from
maven).
First is th
"don't selfish" does not help anything. Sigh
On 7/30/06, liigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tapestry is a open source project.
before you requires others do or not do something, think what you have
done for it.
don't selfish
2006/7/30, Michael Echerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Norbert Sándor wr
this is a very simple minded thinking, liigo...
what would an OS project be without the thousands that use it ? - that tell
u what is needed/ not needed ? the businessfolks that use it ?
contributing means more than just adding some line of code... im in a
position where i choose the technology
I really don't see what all the fuss is about anymore. I've already stated
that I'll be providing "some" form of T4 extension to upgrade to T5 when the
time comes for it.
I've been wanting some of the features in T5 almost since the first day I
started using Tapestry. I'm willing to go through th
jesse,
i didnt mean you, i replied to liigos point of view and i was also pretty
sure that we get an upgrade path - so, i didnt want to "fuss", i just wanted
him to think about the non-programmatic rest of any OS project... and these
are the users and the business-guys that say, "yes use it, becau
liigo wrote:
> tapestry is a open source project.
> before you requires others do or not do something, think what you have
> done for it.
> don't selfish
It'll be selfish keeping my opinions for myself instead of sharing them.
I doubt this discussion aimed to be one about what open source is or
mea
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> I really don't see what all the fuss is about anymore. I've already stated
> that I'll be providing "some" form of T4 extension to upgrade to T5 when
> the
> time comes for it.
> So..There we have it. :)
>
Great! After T3 betas/RCs, T4, I'm looking forward to migrate all ou
Nice,
Now it would be great if some of the people who complain about lack of
stability actually helped in the migration path. I see some people who
are pretty old Tapestry users.
--
Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi
DTQ Software
Web Application Design and Programming
http://www.dtqsoftware.com
Hi,
I am working on a Tapestry application that has over hundreds Tapestry HTML
pages, all sharing one single Java class file. These Tapestry HTML pages are
submitted by users from time to time ... so they are not immediately in the
web application, and they may change from time to time.
The thi
I would take a look at the new ResponseBuilder interface provided in 4.1.
Though it's still possible to do in tapestry 4, the new rendering logic
would make it very easy for you to capture the output of a page render and
do whatever you like with it.
It's also something you can control with a hiv
Hi all,
I'm struggeling with validors. No matter what I do I just get the default **
as message.
I try to write it like this:
validators="validators:required[Please enter your name]"
but I just get the default ** :(
I have also writte my own validators and they work - but not the custom
messages
If you look at the "validators: binding prefix" section I see one statement
that says the Required validator is not configurable. (I could be wrong
about my interpretation, but that's what the docs say)
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/UsersGuide/validation.html
On 7/30/06, Malin Ljungh <[
Apologies for the delay (that whole sleeping thing got in the way) but
its done now:
TAPESTRY 1030 and TAPESTRY 1031 are the two issues' issue #s in JIRA.
Thanks again Jesse/Tapestry team,
Josh
On 7/30/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you file this under JIRA Josh? I'm a litt
If theres a migration path to be had, then Im more than interested in
tapestry 5.
Actually, the one feature I think id like to see at this point (save
for some small its-still-not-final issues with tapestry 4.1) is the
ability to add components programatically.
Everything else seems to be on par
?? Sun, 30 Jul 2006 22:48:39 +0800??Korbinian Bachl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
oh, i see
jesse,
i didnt mean you, i replied to liigos point of view and i was also pretty
sure that we get an upgrade path - so, i didnt want to "fuss", i just
wanted
him to think about the non-programmatic rest
When in a form ,only one required validator.the dojo dialog can't be shown.
ex:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";>
corner.demo.model.one.A Form Page
Jun Tsai
--
Welcome to China Java Users Group(CNJUG).
Hi,
I use acegi for the authentication. Any ideas how would i handle different
start pages for different users?
thank you.
gant
In the dojo.validate.check
if ( profile.required instanceof Array ) {
When only one required validator,profile.required is object.
Jun Tsai
2006/7/31, Jun Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
When in a form ,only one required validator.the dojo dialog can't be
shown.
ex:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tap
Aha! Nice catch :) Can you update JIRA with it?
On 7/31/06, Jun Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the dojo.validate.check
if ( profile.required instanceof Array ) {
When only one required validator,profile.required is object.
Jun Tsai
2006/7/31, Jun Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> When in a
When one requried validator,tapestry produce
tapestry.form.registerProfile
('AForm',{"required":"nameField","nameField":{"required":"请输入[NAME]的内容。"}});
When two or more requried validator,tapestry produce
tapestry.form.registerProfile
('AForm',{"required":["nameField","passwordField"],"nameFie
Or, we can have dojo correct their logic. I'm for dojo handling array/single
objects more generically. I will bring it up with them tomorrow, I'm sure a
fix can be had soon either way. (I've heard rumors but can't say...I'm
biting my tongue =) )
It'll be fixed by tomorrow in whatever form it come
I find in JSONObject:
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
public JSONObject accumulate(String key, Object value)
{
JSONArray a;
Object o = opt(key);
if (o == null)
{
put(key, value);
}
else if (o instanceof JSONArray)
{
But I think that's the correct behaviour. Esp since it's coming directly
from json.org. Dojo got it wrong, I'll correct it tomorrow.
On 7/31/06, Jun Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I find in JSONObject:
/**
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*/
public JSONObject accumulate(String key, Object
guys,
i am trying to implement multi-lingual text within my application. i
have gone through the workbench example but am finding it difficult to
implement the functionality. i essentially want exactly what the
workbench does, let the user select a locale, they press submit and
the application ch
i forgot to mention that i am using tapestry 3.0.3.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
32 matches
Mail list logo
