tive.
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Zeigler"
> To: "Tapestry users"
> Sent: Sunday, 14 November, 2010 01:48:36 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
> Bucharest, Istanbul
> Subject: Re: tapestry-upload firefox
rest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: tapestry-upload firefox bug
I recently incorporated mime-util (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mime-util/)
into a project of mine that needed reliable mime detection. It works pretty
well and is easily extensible especially for text types.
Robert
On Nov 1
I recently incorporated mime-util (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mime-util/)
into a project of mine that needed reliable mime detection. It works pretty
well and is easily extensible especially for text types.
Robert
On Nov 12, 2010, at 11/127:56 AM , p.stavrini...@albourne.com wrote:
> Hi
Wondering if The Guru uses @Persist or onActivate/onPassivate to store these
ideas :)
taha
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Interesting ... and ugly. I'm storing this in the back of my mind, along
> with the question: should Ajax URLs be different than standard URLs
Interesting ... and ugly. I'm storing this in the back of my mind, along
with the question: should Ajax URLs be different than standard URLs?
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:56 AM, wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> When using tapestry-upload I stumbled across an unusual browser bug that I
> spent hours on, so wa
Hi guys,
When using tapestry-upload I stumbled across an unusual browser bug that I
spent hours on, so wanted to share... maybe it helps someone else:
Unlike weaker implementations, UploadedFile.getContentType(); returns the mime
type of the uploaded file by extracting it from the http header '
