Problem solved. Just to give back to the community here is how I
solved it and what I've learned.
First, it looks like when using tapestry-cdi in the project,
tapestry-hibernate becomes completely unnecessary. In fact, it cannot
and should not be used. In general, with JSR-330 (tapestry even
imple
Ive been using tapestry jpa on an application that accesses 3 databases, 1
Postgres and 2 mssql. It's just fine. Surprised tapestry hibernate doesn't
support this.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 09:36, Adam X wrote:
>
> Yes, JPA should an option. I don't think foo uses a single hibe
Yes, JPA should an option. I don't think foo uses a single hibernate
annotation and our foo team often brags how they code to the spec :)
So I will try tapestry-jpa (didn't even know about it). If that
doesn't solve the problem I will try implementing @Session.
I may come back with this if I stil
AFAIK, tapestry-hibernate simply doesn't support it. However, is switching
to JPA an option? You could still be using Hibernate as the provider.
tapestry-jpa merrily supports multi tenancy (and more). If JPA is not an
option, I'd look into implementing your own custom @Session - may not be
too bad
Yep, like I said, that part is easy and I believe I can get that
resolved. My question is how to tell Tapestry that @Inject Session is
done by foo+tapestry-cdi and it should use @Inject @Named Session
instead?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Qbyte Consulting
wrote:
> What about exclude tapestri
What about exclude tapestries default hibernate dependency with Maven exclude?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 09:05, Adam X wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have what seems like a major collision problem and don't know how to
> solve this. My current architecture is as following:
>
> foo
> weld
Hi,
I have what seems like a major collision problem and don't know how to
solve this. My current architecture is as following:
foo
weld
tapestry-cdi
tapestry-core
I'd like to have:
foo
weld
tapestry-cdi
tapestry-hibernate
foo (jar) is a major depenency of my project. It is an internal
company
