all set, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-1947
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611p5713642.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:17:17 -0300, George Christman
wrote:
Thiago, I'd like to donate the following code to the community or anybody
else who may run into this problem.
Nice! Thank you very much! Could you create a JIRA for that and attach the
code below in it? Apache requires some way t
MaxPrecision());
}
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611p5713639.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
Thanks Thiago, exactly what I was looking for. Almost completed :)
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611p5713638.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:50:00 -0300, George Christman
wrote:
Would you be referring to something like this
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/CreatingCustomValidators
Exactly, but for BigDecimals.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---
Would you be referring to something like this
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/CreatingCustomValidators
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611p5713636.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:13:08 -0300, George Christman
wrote:
It's not the most ideal solution, but will work. I'm working on a big
finance form, so lots of these types of fields to be validated. If you
happen to
think of a more robust way of doing this, please keep me posted.
In your cas
1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611p5713633.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional c
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:58:21 -0300, George Christman
wrote:
Would you recommend regex then?
Regex is another String-only validator. If it's for just one field, create
an onValidateFrom[FieldComponentId] () method and do your validation there.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
--
Would you recommend regex then?
-George
- Reply message -
From: "Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo [via Tapestry]"
Date: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 4:52 pm
Subject: Validate BigDecimal maxlength not working
To: "George Christman"
--
View this message in context:
http:/
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:12:40 -0300, George Christman
wrote:
Hello, I can't seem to get my tapestry validator to validate the max
length of a bigdecimal field. It seems to work for string fields without
an issue.
You've answered your own question: this validator is only meant to be used
Hello, I can't seem to get my tapestry validator to validate the max length
of a bigdecimal field. It seems to work for string fields without an issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Validate-BigDecimal-maxlength-not-working-tp5713611.html
Sent fro
12 matches
Mail list logo
