+1 to that.
Btw. I just realized that the ETag value is double quoted (""56633""). Is
that on purpose?
Am 21.01.2014 02:28 schrieb "Howard Lewis Ship" :
> That's an interesting trade-off: bandwidth (gzip better) vs. cost of
> unzipping (gzip worse). Good thing Tapestry does a good job of letting
That's an interesting trade-off: bandwidth (gzip better) vs. cost of
unzipping (gzip worse). Good thing Tapestry does a good job of letting the
client cache the assets!
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Kristian Marinkovic <
kristian.marinko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for all your responses
Thank you for all your responses and references.
What i want to activate is the SIMPLE_OPTIMIZATIONS level that activates
whitespace removal and renaming (shortening) of variables and functions. my
webapp is getting used more by mobile clients (tablets, phonse) than
desktop clients. during testing
That said, in a HTTP 2.0 world, there isn't such an advantage to
aggregation, especially with Tapestry's asset URLs (e.g., the encoding of
the content hash into the URL).
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> Google Closure is best in a situation where *all* the JavaScript
Google Closure is best in a situation where *all* the JavaScript that will
be part of the page is known statically; it goes beyond other minimizers in
that, if you follow certain rules, it can perform real optimizations, such
as dead-code analysis and function inlining. It can work with a couple o
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 07:12:14 -0200, Massimo Lusetti
wrote:
BTW as a side note I'm not completely sure all these minimization and
concatenation are a good thing. Let's think about this a little bit more.
Some resources may help:
http://rubyrogues.com/135-rr-http-2-0-with-ilya-grigorik/
Fro
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
What are you looking for? Advanced minimization, unfortunately, doesn't
> make sense when you are minimizing multiple files (there can always be a
> mix of stacks, libraries, and modules).
>
>
BTW as a side note I'm not completely sure al
What are you looking for? Advanced minimization, unfortunately, doesn't
make sense when you are minimizing multiple files (there can always be a
mix of stacks, libraries, and modules).
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kristian Marinkovic <
kristian.marinko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ho
Hi all,
how do i set additional GoogleClosureMinimizer options? The current
implementation in tapestry-webresources doesn't seem to offer any
configuration possibilities besides replacing the whole service.
cheers,
Kris