Just invoke mailer.sendIt() while training your mocks, without an expect() call.
Copious examples of this in the Tapestry code base.
On Jan 17, 2008 6:06 PM, Angelo Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, that works. one related question:
>
> I have this:
>
> public interface Mailer {
>
Actually, take a look at some EasyMock tutorials (that's what's behind)
i think their site has a few...
Also, use:
Mailer mailer = this.newMock(Mailer.class);
expect(mailer.sendIt()).andReturn("done");
mailer.send();
On Jan 18, 2008 4:06 AM, Angelo Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, that works. one related question:
I have this:
public interface Mailer {
public void send();
public String sendIt();
}
then somewhere in the test, i'd like to make sure send is called, but it can
not passed to expect as the latter expects a object, any way to 'expect' a
void
Mock the session and pass through to the constructor:
Session session = newMock(Session.class);
Service service = new Service(session);
On Jan 17, 2008 8:14 AM, Angelo Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any tutorial on using TapestryTestCase ? say, I'd like to test a
> service
Hi,
Is there any tutorial on using TapestryTestCase ? say, I'd like to test a
service which has Hibernate's Session injected thru constructor, any idea?
Thanks,
A.C.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-using-TapestryTestCase-tp14913469p14913469.html
Sent from the Tapes
