IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 May 2008 18:34
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
>
> I'm not sure I like the idea of a framework FORCING me to do something,
> IMHO poorly structured code should be prevented by coding standards and
> pee
tapestry5-components provides an ognl binding like it worked in t4. See
http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-components/
and
http://87.193.218.134:8080/t5components/t5c-commons/howto_ognlbinding.html
chris
Szemere Szemere wrote:
> I agree with the sentiments above - the framework should provide
I agree with the sentiments above - the framework should provide basic
services and give others the ability to extend it. However I think there is
a lot of value in making it easy for folks to use popular bindings. I for
one, am not a big fan of having to incorporate additional code into my
project
Hey Toby,
> I'm not sure I like the idea of a framework FORCING me to do something
I agree with the sentiment, but in this case isn't it misplaced? I
suppose you are forced to consider which binding implementation to
use, but that feels more like flexibility. Tapestry should make
integrating and
iginal Message
From: Josh Canfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Tuesday, 13 May, 2008 5:55:26 PM
Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Blower, Andy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should be done with care th
.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 12 May 2008 21:59
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
> >
> > Mor expression language would be great; the pain
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2008 21:59
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
>
> Mor expression language would be great; the pain is when you pull
> values out of a Map or Collection and lose their type, at which point
> you also lose an
Mor expression language would be great; the pain is when you pull
values out of a Map or Collection and lose their type, at which point
you also lose annotations and components such as BeanEditor and Grid
no longer operate as expected.
But I agree that having a few boolean operators in the expres
Hi,
Don't know what you folks do, but I have created a bunch of custom
bindings for different cases. The only thing I actually miss is the
ability to COMBINE them.
I.e., I have added a binding
equals:foo=bar
where foo and bar can be other binding objects or literals. I use
it successfully for
we will see what can we do
2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nope; I just want to let you create Insanely Great things, using T5 as the
> base.
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > howard,
> >
> > you make us jobless ;-)
> >
> > 20
Nope; I just want to let you create Insanely Great things, using T5 as the base.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howard,
>
> you make us jobless ;-)
>
> 2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expr
howard,
you make us jobless ;-)
2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expression language
> quite a bit further to address this (invoking methods), as well as map
> and array ceation ... basically, all the cool OGNL stuff people miss.
>
>
In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expression language
quite a bit further to address this (invoking methods), as well as map
and array ceation ... basically, all the cool OGNL stuff people miss.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In looking at convertin
for the
menu problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: kranga [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:53 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
>
> In looking at converting from T3 to T5, I've to deal
Fastest solution is the t5components module, which re-introduces the
ognl binding:
http://87.193.218.134:8080/t5components/t5c-commons/howto_ognlbinding.html
Cheers,
Robert
On May 9, 2008, at 5/99:52 AM , kranga wrote:
In looking at converting from T3 to T5, I've to deal with constructs
su
In looking at converting from T3 to T5, I've to deal with constructs such
as:
class="ognl:menuClassName('home')" where getMenuClassName uses the
parameter to compare with the page's "id" passed in to determine if this is
the currentPage or not. So the template has multiple links with construc
16 matches
Mail list logo
