On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:44:13 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
* Is there a better way to store file content (cache?). Not sure if
reading it on each access is the right way to go.
You should definetely use some form of cache (EHCache, etc).
Never user an expansion (${}) when passing a value t
Tapestry never disappoints! Single page loading content from
activation context is so simple and easy, it just feels like the right
way to go!
Here is what I've got which pretty much works. Static publishable
content wrapped around a layout. Few questions regarding possible
improvements:
* Is the
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> Struts is a completely different beast when compared to Tapestry, so most of
> the approaches used in one don't apply to the other.
I think that's why we are here, Thiago. :-)
mrg
-
That's how I've done it in the past. With URL rewriting, this can be made even
"nicer" in that you can map your more complicated url (with extra
parameters/pathinfo) to a simpler url, and vice versa
Robert
On Jul 23, 2010, at 7/2311:45 AM , Adam Zimowski wrote:
> I was thinking about that Thi
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:45:57 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
I was thinking about that Thiago :) In fact, that's about how we do it
currently with Struts. I'm going to give this a try today.
Struts is a completely different beast when compared to Tapestry, so most
of the approaches used in on
I was thinking about that Thiago :) In fact, that's about how we do it
currently with Struts. I'm going to give this a try today.
Adam
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:31:59 -0300, Adam Zimowski
> wrote:
>
>> I guess worst case scen
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:31:59 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
I guess worst case scenario we can precompile these empty classes
during our publishing process. Need to verify if that will work but
that would be the work around.
Why not having a single page class that loads the content to be rende
I guess worst case scenario we can precompile these empty classes
during our publishing process. Need to verify if that will work but
that would be the work around.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Okay having to try both suggestions I'm finding that requirement of a
> co
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:26:03 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
So is there a way to make Tapestry process a template without a Java
class? That's really, all I need.
No. On the other hand, you can have a Tapestry page to render different
output based on activaction context or query parameters.
Okay having to try both suggestions I'm finding that requirement of a
component class is what's making this simple requirement a difficult
excercise. I was able to get templates to load from a different
location on the filesystem, but that's not really my requirement.
Here is a very simplified sce
I've managed to get more of the docs working, including Javadoc, but
not the component report yet.
http://tapestry.formos.com/nightly/tapx/
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Thank you much Guys. This is definitely giving me ways to explore. I
> will share our solution whe
Thank you much Guys. This is definitely giving me ways to explore. I
will share our solution when it's ready, but may post some questions
first :)
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> Take a look at these past discussions:
>
> http://old.nabble.com/Tapestry-Tem
Take a look at these past discussions:
http://old.nabble.com/Tapestry-Templates-%2B-Scripting-Language-(CMS)-to27191065s302.html#a27191192
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-load-tml-files-from-the-filesystem-instead-of-classpath--tp28462363s302p28469434.html
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independ
The tapx library includes a dynamic templating component that is
probably perfect for your needs. Unfortunately, the documentation for
tapx isn't building lately, so it's a challenge to know about it.
I'll try and work on that over the next couple of days.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Adam Z
One of the big features of our current Struts-based app (we are
porting to T5), is the integration with content management system (we
use RedDot). What we do currently, is we have a single Struts action,
which inspects query parameter for CMS page, and dynamically streams
the markup for that page (
Dear Mr. Mason,
> Tapestry features so I can't us a conventional CMS like Magnolia. Has
> any one else had any success with this sort of integration.
yes, we had. If you look for example at "www.go7seas-kreuzfahrten.de",
you will see a "hybrid". The cruises, the booking process, ship and
journey
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone has had any experience integrating a CMS in
to a Tapestry 5 App. I really like the T5 templating system and so I
am keen to keep using it. However sometimes I need to be able to allow
the user to edit a pages content, however other parts of the site need
Tapestry
17 matches
Mail list logo
