Re: using DTD XHTML Basic 1.1 for mobile app

2012-02-27 Thread Lenny Primak
Sorry, there is no clear cut answer to this question, you will have to do your own research :) On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Paul Stanton wrote: > I don't know for sure Lenny, there seem to be a few different schools of > thought for mobile web apps. > > Can you direct me to a clear and concise

Re: using DTD XHTML Basic 1.1 for mobile app

2012-02-27 Thread Paul Stanton
I don't know for sure Lenny, there seem to be a few different schools of thought for mobile web apps. Can you direct me to a clear and concise argument/document? thanks, Paul. On 28/02/2012 1:14 PM, Lenny Primak wrote: Are you sure you don't just want to stick with HTML5? It's easy and 'free'

Re: using DTD XHTML Basic 1.1 for mobile app

2012-02-27 Thread Lenny Primak
Are you sure you don't just want to stick with HTML5? It's easy and 'free' On Feb 27, 2012, at 9:12 PM, Paul Stanton wrote: > Thanks, I'll give that a go. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For addi

Re: using DTD XHTML Basic 1.1 for mobile app

2012-02-27 Thread Paul Stanton
Thanks, I'll give that a go. On 28/02/2012 11:48 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: If you look in the Tapestry source, you can see that Tapestry keeps local copies of the DTDs and provides a hook to redirect the SAXParser to use the local copy rather than go out on the Internet. Look around Tapestry

Re: using DTD XHTML Basic 1.1 for mobile app

2012-02-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
If you look in the Tapestry source, you can see that Tapestry keeps local copies of the DTDs and provides a hook to redirect the SAXParser to use the local copy rather than go out on the Internet. Look around TapestryModule to see how its done. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Paul Stanton wrot