Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-18 Thread Norman Franke
I checked my .plugins, and a 2.0.0 copy of the plugin was still there. It wouldn't deleted it, so I had to stop the server, manually delete, then restart. Now it works great. Thanks! Norman Franke Answering Service for Directors, Inc. www.myasd.com On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Thiago H. de

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-18 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:40:30 -0300, Norman Franke escreveu: Do others have this working without a contributeComponentClassTransformWorker? I'd like to have it working normally, if possible. It's working for me out of the box. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, de

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-18 Thread Norman Franke
Do others have this working without a contributeComponentClassTransformWorker? I'd like to have it working normally, if possible. Norman Franke Answering Service for Directors, Inc. www.myasd.com On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Norman Franke wrote: It does not appear to solve the @Secured is

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-17 Thread Norman Franke
It does not appear to solve the @Secured issue for me under T5.1.0.5. I still need to add the: contributeComponentClassTransformWorker method in my AppModules.java. Otherwise, @Secured is ignored. Norman Franke Answering Service for Directors, Inc. www.myasd.com On May 29, 2009, at 5:32 PM

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-04 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Em Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:18:32 -0300, Robin Helgelin escreveu: Don't thank me, thank Michael, I'm just the messenger this time :) Thanks Michael for the code and Robin for bringing the good news! :) -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor http:

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-04 Thread Robin Helgelin
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 15:25, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > It does work! Thank you a lot, Robin! :) Don't thank me, thank Michael, I'm just the messenger this time :) -- regards, Robin - To unsubscrib

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-04 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
It does work! Thank you a lot, Robin! :) -- Thiago - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-06-04 Thread Jorge Saridis
I, also, can confirm it works under Tapestry 5.1.0.5 + Glassfish Thanks On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Juan E. Maya wrote: > I can confirm it works under the Tapestry 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT > Thanks a lot !!! > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Michael Gerzabek > wrote: > >> Hi Thiago, >> >> yes it s

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-05-30 Thread Juan E. Maya
I can confirm it works under the Tapestry 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT Thanks a lot !!! On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Michael Gerzabek wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > yes it should. Anyway more feedback is wanted. > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schrieb: > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-05-30 Thread Michael Gerzabek
Hi Thiago, yes it should. Anyway more feedback is wanted. Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schrieb: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote: Hi, Hi! I've just uploaded a 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT release of tapestry-spring-security with support for Tapestry 5.1. We're releasin

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-05-29 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote: > >> Hi, > > Hi! > >> I've just uploaded a 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT release of >> tapestry-spring-security with support for Tapestry 5.1. >> We're releasing this as a SNAPSHOT so

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

2009-05-29 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote: > Hi, Hi! > I've just uploaded a 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT release of > tapestry-spring-security with support for Tapestry 5.1. > We're releasing this as a SNAPSHOT so that we can see that it actually > works for everybody before we make the final rel