On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:30 AM, mad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Howard, that seems to have been the issue. I moved Layout.tml to
> /src/main/resources/org/apache/tapestry5/tutorial/components, and now
> everything works beautifully. Is this the right place?
>
> An annotation would
Thanks, Howard, that seems to have been the issue. I moved Layout.tml to
/src/main/resources/org/apache/tapestry5/tutorial/components, and now
everything works beautifully. Is this the right place?
An annotation would be nice, but also might I suggest a less cryptic error
message for components
Tapestry couldn't find your component's template and was forced to
assume it didn't exist. I'm beginning to wonder if we need an
annotation for components that don't have a template, since this can
be a bastard for newbies to track down.
Component templates are stored on the classpath, with the
i think you misunderstood:
2008/11/27 mad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The Layout component contains the tag:
>
>
>
> as shown below. (Maybe my ellipsis was confusing... sorry about that.)
>
>
>
> Sven Homburg wrote:
> >
> > is there no tag in your layout ?
> >
> > 2008/11/27 mad <[EMAI
The Layout component contains the tag:
as shown below. (Maybe my ellipsis was confusing... sorry about that.)
Sven Homburg wrote:
>
> is there no tag in your layout ?
>
> 2008/11/27 mad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I hate to ask the same question twice. I did actuall
is there no tag in your layout ?
2008/11/27 mad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi again,
>
> I hate to ask the same question twice. I did actually have this working
> with a previous version of T5, but in 5.0.15, the tag is failing,
> like this:
>
> Render queue error in Text[ toto ]: This markup
Hi again,
I hate to ask the same question twice. I did actually have this working
with a previous version of T5, but in 5.0.15, the tag is failing,
like this:
Render queue error in Text[ toto ]: This markup writer does not have a
current element. The current element is established with the fir
,
> Marc
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Angelo Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 02:03
> Subject: Re: creating components with Tapestry 5
>
>
> >
> > Hi Mad,
> >
> > Initially I like WebObjec
- Original Message -
From: "Angelo Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 02:03
Subject: Re: creating components with Tapestry 5
Hi Mad,
Initially I like WebObjects, particularly the bundled tools, As a
Cocoa/Objective - C developer using XCode, I lik
WOComponentContent is wonderful, and is actually quite easy to do in
Tapestry. It's in one of the examples.
You use a body component.
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-core/guide/templates.html
go down to the Tapestry Elements section, and read the examples
there. It should be
Hi Mad,
Initially I like WebObjects, particularly the bundled tools, As a
Cocoa/Objective - C developer using XCode, I like to use WO with the same
set of tools, but finally settled with Tapestry 5 as what rumor says that
Tapestry has some inheritage from WO:) Cayenne, is it the ORM tool? I'm
usi
Hello Marc,
me, I'm another one seeking for good old WebObjects features in the
post Apple world ... unfortunately, my company is completely on JSF
trip, which I absolutely dislike.
But on to your question:
is WOComponentContent.
That was simple wasn't it? :-)
Marcus.
2007/9/23, Marc A. Doni
12 matches
Mail list logo
