Hi Danie,
Thanks for suggeseting T5, after one day learning, somehow I know how to
create a basic T5 app, cool framkework. was reading the book "Enjoying Web
development with Tapestry" before, after several chapters, I found myself
enjoying nothing, with all those diagrams, xml specs, etc.. T5 is
If you can wait for AJAX functionality (late 2007?) , I would say go
with Tapestry 5. If you need AJAX immediately, the latest Tapestry 4
is best. Tapestry 5 is the "next generation" Tapestry, and the T4
code is not directly compatible. That said, your T4 code isn't
completely useless either. T
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply, I'm learning Tapestry 4, from those samples I saw,
it's ok to use either abtract or not as page class, so which one is better?
maybe non abstract class to be compatible with Tapestry 5? I'm just
evaluating frameworks for a coming project, is it advisable to use Ta
Hi Tapestry 4 relied more on abstract classes. In Tapestry 5, you are
usually writing concrete classes -- tapestry does it's magic on all
the classes under /pages. You can still have an abstract class to
base your pages on, but that class should probably go in /base instead
of /pages, since it wo