That, or just add @Cached to getItems.
-Filip
On 2008-07-21 20:48, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Yes, and perhaps adding a SetupRender render phase method to setup a
temporary list with the values to iterate over.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
O
Yes, and perhaps adding a SetupRender render phase method to setup a
temporary list with the values to iterate over.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2008-07-21 17:49, margi wrote:
>>
>> That's what I did finally! You're right about the fac
Hi,
On 2008-07-21 17:49, margi wrote:
That's what I did finally! You're right about the fact that we're not
supposed to have logic in template, but personnaly I think there as some
logics that don't worth a Getter. Imagine if my list contains 10 elements
through which I have to iterate, I'd be
Em Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:49:43 -0300, margi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
That's what I did finally! You're right about the fact that we're not
supposed to have logic in template, but personnaly I think there as some
logics that don't worth a Getter. Imagine if my list contains 10 elements
throug
>
> Imagine if my list contains 10 elements
> through which I have to iterate, I'd be oblige to write 10 getters,
>
I would say that a design that is pulling items from a list like this is
questionable. I would be curious to hear of a real world example where this
is the best solution.
Josh
On M
Thiago, you are completely right, but I think sometimes we cannot
avoid to make simple tests or pass some arguments to a method... I try
not to use it too much, but sometimes it makes my life easier. This is
actually a major issue for me.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, margi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That's what I did finally! You're right about the fact that we're not
supposed to have logic in template, but personnaly I think there as some
logics that don't worth a Getter. Imagine if my list contains 10 elements
through which I have to iterate, I'd be oblige to write 10 getters, I really
thi
Em Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:22:31 -0300, margi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
retrieve one element whose index I know. In T4 I'd invoke
myList.getItem(index). I've tried ${myList.getItem(index)}, b ut didn't
work. I'd appreciate if someone can tell me what I miss or the way to do
Try creating a gett
Hi margi,
This is a known issue, marked to be solved to 5.1 version. see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1624
I believe this feature was removed because of the bottleneck created
by the use of OGNL to evaluate those expressions. Tapestry uses a very
own solution that right now is no
