igueiredo"
To: "Tapestry users" , "P Stavrinides"
Sent: Monday, 20 June, 2011 14:52:06 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: Unit testing mixins
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:22:27 -0300, wrote:
> Hi Inge, Thiago,
Hi!
> Firstly, Thanks
Hi
The best way to learn testing tapestry is by reading the tests present in
the source code. Also, I learned a lot from the test written in chenillekit.
Hope it helps
regards
Taha
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 04:22:27 -0300, wrote:
Hi Inge, Thiago,
Hi!
Firstly, Thanks guys for your replies!
I was aware of Jasmine, but not JsTestDriver... together they look very
promising (powerful) for unit tests. I think I will give them a go.
You're welcome!
As for Selenium, we had use
maintenance this time.
Thanks again!
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Inge Solvoll"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Friday, 17 June, 2011 13:11:12 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: Unit testing mixins
As long as your JS code is clean with low coupli
As long as your JS code is clean with low coupling, I think the best
solution is to do pure JS testing.
I've done a lot of this. Used Jasmine BDD for testing the javascript code.
Very nice testing framework that works both in the browser and headless,
from Jenkins/Hudson.
http://pivotal.github.co
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:43:28 -0300, wrote:
Hi all,
Hi!
We are converting most of our JavaScript code in our Tapestry
applications into mixins, and I was wandering if anyone can recommend a
testing framework / methodology for unit testing these mixins.
I use JUnit (it could be TestNG or
