the tapestry committee will get the behavior it tolerates. unproductive
behavior should not be tolerated any more than obnoxious behavior would be
tolerated in your own home.
tapestry group would be well advised to ban obnoxious behavior like this.
Patrick Moore
(256) 203-3775
Currently looking f
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:09:23 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah
wrote:
Remember, this guy is working for free, as in beer.
Didn't you tell everygody I had secretly left Apache? Now you're saying
I'm working, present tense?
Joe nailed it: "Your warnings are empty and you prove yourself a greater
an
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:33:56 -0200, Ido Dovrat
wrote:
Thiago, I think it would be reasonable to put in place some kind of
identity verification /screening process before admitting someone into
the group. For example, use the email address to look up the applicant on
Facebook or LinkedIn, a
Agree.
On Feb 15, 2016 8:38 AM, "Stelios Philippou" wrote:
> Do not agree to that.
>
> That will make it harder for new users to ask for help.
> Tapestry unfortunately is not very popular, so not a lot of places to ask
> for questions.
>
> Just ignore him, and can we please stop replying to this
Emmanuel,
I can think of stupider things. For instance, you wasting your time and
effort in this thread. Thiago may be working for free, but you see, people
actually appreciate his work. Few people here, if anyone, appreciate you
or what you have to say. Your warnings are empty and you prove yo
Ido,
That is the stupidest thing you can think of. You make it sound like Tapestry
is a prestigious framework worth all those extra effort from Thiago. Remember,
this guy is working for free, as in beer. If you want that layer of
verification, why don't you take the baton and do it yourself? B
Do not agree to that.
That will make it harder for new users to ask for help.
Tapestry unfortunately is not very popular, so not a lot of places to ask
for questions.
Just ignore him, and can we please stop replying to this thread !
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 at 15:34 Ido Dovrat wrote:
> Thiago,
Dumb idea. How about background check? Are we applying for a CIA job?
On Feb 15, 2016 8:34 AM, "Ido Dovrat" wrote:
> Thiago, I think it would be reasonable to put in place some kind of
> identity verification /screening process before admitting someone into the
> group. For example, use the email
Thiago, I think it would be reasonable to put in place some kind of
identity verification /screening process before admitting someone into the
group. For example, use the email address to look up the applicant on
Facebook or LinkedIn, and apply some judgement as to whether he/she seems
legit. You c
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:59 -0200, JT wrote:
Shitty idea. All voice should be heard. Not just the one you like to
hear.
If only this guy wrote anything which isn't trolling and outright lies,
all them repetitive. If he said that feature X doesn't work, that would be
valid. That feature
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:19:09 -0200, Ilya Obshadko
wrote:
Thiago, I have an idea.
Hello, Ilya!
Why don't we ban this poor excuse of an idiot from a mailing list and
address real problems latest release has?
This was discussed before. The consensus was that banning him would just
cause
: http://www.tapestry5book.com/ for T53, but it's a lot of
> > new features in T54 to cover.
> > >
> > > S-E
> > >
> > > From: Ilya Obshadko-2 [via Apache Tapestry Mailing List Archives]
> > [mailto:ml-node+s1045711n5732111...@n5.nabble.com]
> >
p://www.tapestry5book.com/ for T53, but it's a lot of
> new features in T54 to cover.
> >
> > S-E
> >
> > From: Ilya Obshadko-2 [via Apache Tapestry Mailing List Archives]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1045711n5732111...@n5.nabble.com]
> > Sent: 13. februar 2016 09:20
>
.
>
> S-E
>
> From: Ilya Obshadko-2 [via Apache Tapestry Mailing List Archives]
> [mailto:ml-node+s1045711n5732111...@n5.nabble.com]
> Sent: 13. februar 2016 09:20
> To: Svein-Erik Løken
> Subject: Re: Tapestry is a sinking Ship
>
> Thiago, I have an idea.
>
>
JT please try to make some facebook friends and stop polluting our inbox with
non-technical questions about something you do not use or understand at all. If
something in T5 is not working, is to complicated feel free to give us samples
and the members of the T5 sect will pick it up and improve
Just hit delete or better unsub. Lol
On Feb 13, 2016 11:36 AM, "Andreas Fink" wrote:
> I would rephrase it to: Everybody should be allowed to raise his voice but
> let me choose if i want to listen...
> There are filter rules for 'He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named in my mail client ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Andi.
I would rephrase it to: Everybody should be allowed to raise his voice but let
me choose if i want to listen...
There are filter rules for 'He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named in my mail client ;-)
Cheers,
Andi.
On 13 Feb 2016, at 13:17 , JT wrote:
> Shitty idea. All voice should be heard. Not just the o
Shitty idea. All voice should be heard. Not just the one you like to hear.
On Feb 13, 2016 3:19 AM, "Ilya Obshadko" wrote:
> Thiago, I have an idea.
>
> Why don't we ban this poor excuse of an idiot from a mailing list and
> address real problems latest release has?
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10
iling List Archives]
[mailto:ml-node+s1045711n5732111...@n5.nabble.com]
Sent: 13. februar 2016 09:20
To: Svein-Erik Løken
Subject: Re: Tapestry is a sinking Ship
Thiago, I have an idea.
Why don't we ban this poor excuse of an idiot from a mailing list and
address real problems latest release ha
Thiago, I have an idea.
Why don't we ban this poor excuse of an idiot from a mailing list and
address real problems latest release has?
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:19:28 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah
> wrote:
>
> H
For Eclipse, you want to install Dmitry Gusev's excellent Tapestry plugin
https://github.com/anjlab/eclipse-tapestry5-plugin.
By the way, I agree with your comments about javascript documentation. It's
great if you've been working with Javascript and AMD modules before, but
totally lost if you hav
still trolling ?!?!? :)))
> On 13 Feb 2016, at 6:19 AM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
>
> Hi Tapestry sect,
>
> The state of Tapestry now is very bad, as Howard and all the other commiters
> have abandoned it. Tapestry is now a sinking ship, and Mr Ship himself has
> abandoned this sinking ship.
> O
Hi, I met your framework couple days ago. From Wednsday till this
moment, I managed to compile a pet project in maven, loaded in eclipse,
studied code, started to work in an agile but solo way and now I have:
4 screens under tabbed layout
1 page with grid and a form to submit a simple informatio
we'll all be dead, soon.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:18 PM, JT wrote:
> Not dead, yet but soon.
> On Feb 12, 2016 5:07 PM, "Stephen Nutbrown" wrote:
>
> > The only reason you email the Tapestry users group is because Tapestry
> > Users has many subscribers.
> >
> > The only reason Tapestery Users
Not dead, yet but soon.
On Feb 12, 2016 5:07 PM, "Stephen Nutbrown" wrote:
> The only reason you email the Tapestry users group is because Tapestry
> Users has many subscribers.
>
> The only reason Tapestery Users has many subscribers is because Tapestry is
> not dead.
>
>
>
> On 12 February 2016
i still know what he/she is gonna do about it.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Stephen Nutbrown
wrote:
> The only reason you email the Tapestry users group is because Tapestry
> Users has many subscribers.
>
> The only reason Tapestery Users has many subscribers is because Tapestry is
> not dea
The only reason you email the Tapestry users group is because Tapestry
Users has many subscribers.
The only reason Tapestery Users has many subscribers is because Tapestry is
not dead.
On 12 February 2016 at 22:00, David Taylor
wrote:
> If Tapestry is so terrible, why waste all the energy? Ju
If Tapestry is so terrible, why waste all the energy? Just to be obnoxious?
We would abandon Tapestry tomorrow if it weren't so bloody fast and easy
to extend.
emailsig On 2/12/2016 3:53 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:19:28 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah
wrote:
Hi
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:19:28 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah
wrote:
Hi Tapestry sect,
Hi, insistent, annoying, repetitive, low-quality troll!
The state of Tapestry now is very bad, as Howard and all the other
commiters have abandoned it.
This is not true. Just check Jira and the Git logs.
Even
ok then.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:55 PM, JT wrote:
> We did. To angularjs and react.
> On Feb 12, 2016 2:19 PM, "Emmanuel Sowah" wrote:
>
> > Hi Tapestry sect,
> >
> > The state of Tapestry now is very bad, as Howard and all the other
> > commiters have abandoned it. Tapestry is now a sinking
We did. To angularjs and react.
On Feb 12, 2016 2:19 PM, "Emmanuel Sowah" wrote:
> Hi Tapestry sect,
>
> The state of Tapestry now is very bad, as Howard and all the other
> commiters have abandoned it. Tapestry is now a sinking ship, and Mr Ship
> himself has abandoned this sinking ship.
> Over
and if we don't what are you gonna do about it
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
> Hi Tapestry sect,
>
> The state of Tapestry now is very bad, as Howard and all the other
> commiters have abandoned it. Tapestry is now a sinking ship, and Mr Ship
> himself has abandoned this
32 matches
Mail list logo
