Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x

2009-03-26 Thread ningdh
s. Thanks, DH - Original Message - From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" To: "Tapestry users" Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:55 PM Subject: Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:18 AM, DH wrote: >> Maybe caused by Mu

Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x

2009-03-26 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 4:18 AM, DH wrote: > Maybe caused by MutableComponentModel#addRenderPhase? > I don't use T-S-S, but have another role annotation based solution. I can > work before 5.0.18 too but fail when upgrade to 5.1.0.0. > I need call MutableComponentModel#addRenderPhase to make it w

Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x

2009-03-25 Thread Juan E. Maya
i was also having issues with spring-security. The @secured annotation is not being processed however u could still secured the pages contributing the FilterSecurityInterceptor. I was able to find out why the annotation was not being processed,l i am still trying to understand some of the ioc beha

Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x

2009-03-25 Thread DH
Maybe caused by MutableComponentModel#addRenderPhase? I don't use T-S-S, but have another role annotation based solution. I can work before 5.0.18 too but fail when upgrade to 5.1.0.0. I need call MutableComponentModel#addRenderPhase to make it work at the end of the security transformerworker.

Re: Tapestry-Spring-Security and Tapestry 5.1.0.x

2009-03-24 Thread Anthony Schexnaildre
Someone else mentioned that they were having issues with the same thing no more than a week ago. I don't remember them having a solution either. -Anthony On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: Hi! Is it just me or Tapestry-Spring-Security doesn't work with Tape