Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-29 Thread George Christman
Josh, Thanks a ton... very much appreciated. This is exactly what I was looking for. My form consist of about 20/30 fields, so I don't think I'll see much of a performance issue using option 1. As far as option two, I wasn't aware tapestry allowed us to pass back a value through the parameter varia

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-28 Thread Josh Canfield
There are at least a few reasonable approaches to this problem, different approaches make more sense depending on how you're storing the data. For instance, I can't tell from your description whether you are determining the enable/disable state using business logic about the workflow/role, or if y

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-28 Thread George Christman
Thanks Thiago for your response. I have a single form with a very large workflow, throughout the workflow individual fields are either disabled or enabled depending on user role and workflow state. I have all the field id's stored in the db, so on render I was hoping to get my list of my disabled/e

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-28 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:08:10 -0200, George Christman wrote: Hi Thiago, Hi! thanks for the response. How would you recommend controlling the individual fields dynamically? The same way I've explained before. Put this logic inside isDisabled(). By the way, what do you mean by dynamicall

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-28 Thread George Christman
Hi Thiago, thanks for the response. How would you recommend controlling the individual fields dynamically? I tried something like this, public boolean isDisabled() { if (componentResources.getEmbeddedComponent("unitPrice").getComponentResources().isRendering()) { return fals

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-25 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:21:32 -0200, George Christman wrote: Eric, were you able to ever get this to work? I'm attempting to accomplish the same thing. Have you tried: public isDisabled() { return ...; } -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2011-11-25 Thread George Christman
Eric, were you able to ever get this to work? I'm attempting to accomplish the same thing. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/T5-dynamically-set-disabled-attribute-tp2414476p5023268.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2008-01-18 Thread Eric BIANCHI
I think I'm doing something wrong here Following Howard post, I tried : @Inject private BindingSource _source; public void setupRender () { Binding b = _source.newBinding("Parameter Disabled", _componentSources .getEmbdededComponent("myComponentId").getComponentResources(), "prop", "disab

Re: T5: dynamically set disabled attribute

2008-01-17 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Beginner's level Tapestry: Bind the disabled parameter of each field to a property that returns true when the field should be disabled and false otherwise. Journeyman level Tapestry: An alternative would be to define a special kind of binding for this purpose. I'd need more details, but a Bindi