IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 May 2008 18:34
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
>
> I'm not sure I like the idea of a framework FORCING me to do something,
> IMHO poorly structured code should be prevented by coding standards and
> pee
tapestry5-components provides an ognl binding like it worked in t4. See
http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-components/
and
http://87.193.218.134:8080/t5components/t5c-commons/howto_ognlbinding.html
chris
Szemere Szemere wrote:
> I agree with the sentiments above - the framework should provide
I agree with the sentiments above - the framework should provide basic
services and give others the ability to extend it. However I think there is
a lot of value in making it easy for folks to use popular bindings. I for
one, am not a big fan of having to incorporate additional code into my
project
Hey Toby,
> I'm not sure I like the idea of a framework FORCING me to do something
I agree with the sentiment, but in this case isn't it misplaced? I
suppose you are forced to consider which binding implementation to
use, but that feels more like flexibility. Tapestry should make
integrating and
iginal Message
From: Josh Canfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Tuesday, 13 May, 2008 5:55:26 PM
Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Blower, Andy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should be done with care th
.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 12 May 2008 21:59
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
> >
> > Mor expression language would be great; the pain
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 May 2008 21:59
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: T5: Calling method with parameter in prop
>
> Mor expression language would be great; the pain is when you pull
> values out of a Map or Collection and lose their type, at which point
> you also lose an
Mor expression language would be great; the pain is when you pull
values out of a Map or Collection and lose their type, at which point
you also lose annotations and components such as BeanEditor and Grid
no longer operate as expected.
But I agree that having a few boolean operators in the expres
Hi,
Don't know what you folks do, but I have created a bunch of custom
bindings for different cases. The only thing I actually miss is the
ability to COMBINE them.
I.e., I have added a binding
equals:foo=bar
where foo and bar can be other binding objects or literals. I use
it successfully for
we will see what can we do
2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nope; I just want to let you create Insanely Great things, using T5 as the
> base.
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > howard,
> >
> > you make us jobless ;-)
> >
> > 20
Nope; I just want to let you create Insanely Great things, using T5 as the base.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> howard,
>
> you make us jobless ;-)
>
> 2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expr
howard,
you make us jobless ;-)
2008/5/9 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expression language
> quite a bit further to address this (invoking methods), as well as map
> and array ceation ... basically, all the cool OGNL stuff people miss.
>
>
In 5.1 I want to extend the Tapestry property expression language
quite a bit further to address this (invoking methods), as well as map
and array ceation ... basically, all the cool OGNL stuff people miss.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:52 AM, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In looking at convertin
I missed that functionality as well. I use the ognl binding available in
the t5components library.
http://87.193.218.134:8080/t5components/index.html
I remember trying something complicated once, and I had problems with values
being cached that should not have been, but it worked beautifully
Fastest solution is the t5components module, which re-introduces the
ognl binding:
http://87.193.218.134:8080/t5components/t5c-commons/howto_ognlbinding.html
Cheers,
Robert
On May 9, 2008, at 5/99:52 AM , kranga wrote:
In looking at converting from T3 to T5, I've to deal with constructs
su
15 matches
Mail list logo
