nal Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:24 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Portlets on Tapestry 4.1
Ok, I think I'm a little out of my element here.
I can't honestly say I understand the day to day sort of development
patterns tha
anks,
Ezra Epstein
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:24 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Portlets on Tapestry 4.1
Ok, I think I'm a little out of my element here.
I can't honestly say I understand the day to day sort
More importantly than that, we'd have a potential "situation" wrt ~other~
portlets also including javascript.
It seems like something that you'd think would come up more often. I'd be
interested in knowing if things like css/script includes have been addressed
by anyone else in the portlet commun
Ok, I think I'm a little out of my element here.
I can't honestly say I understand the day to day sort of development
patterns that people use with Tapestry portlets.
Is there an equivalent idea to something containing each page? (ie something
that handles stylesheets/ etc ?)
Rather than tryin
Hmm...Good question. I will answer with a documentation page.
On 8/2/06, Epstein, Ezra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We want to move to 4.1 for our portlets. Reading up I find:
"By default, the Shell component will include the core dojo javascript
object dojo.js, as well as the new core Tapestry
