Re: PersistentFieldStrategy and conversations

2009-01-15 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Yeap, working on it, just figured it should be safe to use the shadow. With the current interface, discarding changes (of conversations) might yield unexpected results though; I'll see what becomes out of it once I get a little further along with the implementation. Kalle On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at

Re: PersistentFieldStrategy and conversations

2009-01-15 Thread Richard Kirby
Due to the magic of tapestry IOC, just inject the Request object into your implementation of PersistentFieldStrategy and you have access - no need to change/extend the PersistentFieldStrategy interface! Richard. Kalle Korhonen wrote: I'd like to implement a custom PersistentFieldStrategy for