BTW Henri, I'm using (I guess yours) implementation of OSIVF
(HibernateRequestFilter), so far its working great (I've dump the
Spring version, cuz when I add friendly urls for direct service. It
quit working, I guess I needed another filter mapping on web.xml)
Just wanna now, if spring transactio
I wouldn't have any concerns about performances. An empty hibernate session
is lightweight. We did originally consider not opening hibernate sessions
for some pages but the impact on performances was so low that we did not
bother doing anything like that. What does matter on the performance side
h
I have the same concerns, but for some reason few people care to make the
creation and closing of a session depend on actual use.
Relating it to the page name is a weak solution imo. It should be a concern
handled strictly and transparently by the persistence framework
(provided that you define t
Well I guess, I'm just worried about performance, those page will
handle a few thousands of concurrent users, and they use ajax, we
expect something like 500-700 simultaneous requests for the pages.
Best regards
On 8/22/06, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you really need to turn it of
Do you really need to turn it off?
It shouldn't hurt to have it on even if you don't need an hibernate session.
On 8/22/06, Vinicius Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello there! I'm using OSIVF with spring in my app. I had it
configured just like examples on the wiki:
hibernateFi
