.
2010/2/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:07:44 -0200, cordenier christophe <
> christophe.corden...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have also thought about this solution, but it requires to instantiate
>> objects for simple lists of String.
>>
>
> IMHO, it's way better to insta
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:07:44 -0200, cordenier christophe
wrote:
I have also thought about this solution, but it requires to instantiate
objects for simple lists of String.
IMHO, it's way better to instantiate one or two dozens of objects and keep
the configuration simple than complicate t
I meant i have chosen to implement your second solution that is effectively
better in separation of concerns but requires more declarations in my Module
class (if i have understood it well)
2010/2/4 Howard Lewis Ship
> Sometimes it codes better, too ... separation of concerns.
>
> On Thu, Feb 4,
Sometimes it codes better, too ... separation of concerns.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:43 AM, cordenier christophe
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have chosen the second solution. It works fine.
>
> Regards,
> Christophe
>
> 2010/2/4 Howard Lewis Ship
>
>> Contribute a map of instead.
>>
>> Or have two services
Hi
I have chosen the second solution. It works fine.
Regards,
Christophe
2010/2/4 Howard Lewis Ship
> Contribute a map of instead.
>
> Or have two services to manage the list and a third service that makes
> use of the first two services (& their configurations).
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:
Contribute a map of instead.
Or have two services to manage the list and a third service that makes
use of the first two services (& their configurations).
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:34 AM, cordenier christophe
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a use case where i want to provide to my service a white list
I have also thought about this solution, but it requires to instantiate
objects for simple lists of String.
2010/2/4 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:47:17 -0200, cordenier christophe <
> christophe.corden...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The problem is that i need to build dedic
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:47:17 -0200, cordenier christophe
wrote:
The problem is that i need to build dedicated service to handle
whiteList and blackList for each service that requires different
configuration if i
don't want to manipulate Map, it will create 2*n + n instance of services
fo
The problem is that i need to build dedicated service to handle whiteList
and blackList for each service that requires different configuration if i
don't want to manipulate Map, it will create 2*n + n instance of services
for services that requires a WhiteListManager and a BlackListManager. By
ext
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:20:04 -0200, Kristian Marinkovic
wrote:
as with the activation context i think it would be very
error prone (from my exprience). what if you really
swap the parameter positions, consider more than
two parameters. i think the chance to create bugs that
cannot be detected
we a good idea as you could spare
>> some indirections
>>
>
> Nice idea !
>
>
>>
>> g,
>> kris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> cordenier christophe
>> 04.02.2010 15:16
>> Bitte antworten an
>> "Tapestry users"
>>
>
> g,
> kris
>
>
>
>
> cordenier christophe
> 04.02.2010 15:16
> Bitte antworten an
> "Tapestry users"
>
>
> An
> Tapestry users
> Kopie
>
> Thema
> Re: Multiple configuration items per service
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2010/2/4 Kris
ers
Kopie
Thema
Re: Multiple configuration items per service
2010/2/4 Kristian Marinkovic
> hi,
>
> i guess it is so because it is difficult to distinguish the
> contributions if they are of the same type:
>
> Filter(Collection whitelist, Collection blacklist>)
>
&g
2010/2/4 Kristian Marinkovic
> hi,
>
> i guess it is so because it is difficult to distinguish the
> contributions if they are of the same type:
>
> Filter(Collection whitelist, Collection blacklist>)
>
> contribute(Configuration blacklist, Configuration
> whitelist)
>
Also i think ordering shou
Hi
Thanks for your quick answer, the thing is that i have multiple security
filters with their own list of whiteList and blackList.
Then i will have a lot of indirection contribution methods. I will try to
find a better design approach to my filters.
I should have a global filter chain and use a
hi,
i guess it is so because it is difficult to distinguish the
contributions if they are of the same type:
Filter(Collection whitelist, Collection blacklist>)
contribute(Configuration blacklist, Configuration
whitelist)
i solve these type of problems by creating two seperate services either
16 matches
Mail list logo