That's it - thanks
On 08/02/2008, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's early, that should be TranslatorSource and TranslatorDefaultSource.
>
> On Feb 8, 2008 6:18 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ValidatorDefaultSource service has gone away. You must make
It's early, that should be TranslatorSource and TranslatorDefaultSource.
On Feb 8, 2008 6:18 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ValidatorDefaultSource service has gone away. You must make sure
> you are contributing to the ValidatorSource service (it has "absorbed"
> the Valid
The ValidatorDefaultSource service has gone away. You must make sure
you are contributing to the ValidatorSource service (it has "absorbed"
the ValidatorDefaultSource service).
On Feb 8, 2008 6:12 AM, Patrick Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We implemented getType(). For example,
>
> public
We implemented getType(). For example,
public Class getType() {
return BigDecimal.class;
}
But we observe the same behaviour. Looks like the lookup by type isn't
working correctly.
On 08/02/2008, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks like the Translator interface has been ch
It looks like the Translator interface has been changed. There is now a
method with the following signature that you must implement:
public Class getType();
I haven't dug into why that is, but my guess is that has something to do
with generics and type erasure.
--
Kevin
On 2/8/08 7:39 AM, in
