Re: How to get rid of some T5 stack traces ...

2010-01-29 Thread Gunnar Eketrapp
Hi ! Hum ... xhr !? That reminds me about that we have had problems with Internet Explorer and zone updates. Somehting with that the xhr flag (!?) was not set ... I will have to dig into this ... but don't have the time right now! /Gunnar 2010/1/29 Ville Virtanen > > Hi, > > hrx -> xhr :D

Re: How to get rid of some T5 stack traces ...

2010-01-29 Thread Ville Virtanen
Hi, hrx -> xhr :D It is true that T5 catches many of these "I-did-not-even-know-something-makes-these" -requests, and it is good to know of this happening. Obviously I should also take a look at the URL re-write functionality. - Ville Ps. It's minus 20 Celsius here... (-4 Fahrenheit) I'm fr

Re: How to get rid of some T5 stack traces ...

2010-01-28 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:47:08 -0200, Ville Virtanen wrote: Hi, Hi! One way to prevent this is to contribute a T5 httprequest filter that just redirects to error page if it detects a post url submitted using GET. Well, Tapestry always submit by POST, so any submission using GET is not

Re: How to get rid of some T5 stack traces ...

2010-01-28 Thread Ville Virtanen
Hi, One way to prevent this is to contribute a T5 httprequest filter that just redirects to error page if it detects a post url submitted using GET. (And isn't hrx?) This is one of the T5 weaker sides I think. It produces many like these in the production for us for a site that slightly altered u