Thanks everyone for all your suggestions. I think I'll just test the
difference solutions out on free test accounts and see which one works best
for me.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Hosting-Tapestry-App-on-Cloud-tp5717236p5717301.html
Sent from the Tap
I've been using VPS style hosting for almost 10 years now, switched to Amazon
about 5 years ago and my current thought is I will never buy hardware again.
I ended up with AWS because the various VPS venders I was using would come
and go and switching was too much work. My thought is AWS is here to
> I looked into Amazon and it seems a bit pricey for a
> small app, so I'm wondering if anybody has any other suggestions?
I have deploying our Tapestry application to Jelastic. Works pretty well
for me so far and not very expensive either. We are still in a closed pilot
phase though, ironing ou
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:02 PM, George Christman
wrote:
> Who do you guys recommend for VPS? I'd rather get out of owning my own box.
> Our current hosting cost is 350/mo for a 2 space rack. This includes a 45mb
> pipe, but does not include hardware cost.
Not having to own your own box is a majo
off topic dude - create a new thread marked [OT] in the subject so you don't
piss people off :)
check webhostingtalk forums, it's a hosting related question.
you get for what you pay for - it's not a price only thing, otherwise you could
run up a bunch of lowendbox.com servers for really crappy b
Thanks guys, I'll have to get some help with the image processing. So does
$350/mo seem a bit steep for our own dedicated box? I guess I don't know how
to value our current services.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Hosting-Tapestry-App-on-Cloud-tp5717236p5
hetzner in germany is well priced for a dedicated servers, perhaps create a new
thread with [OT] in the subject
what thiago/lenny say are right...have an image processing service seeing as
it's your bottleneck - an aws instance and cloudfront may be the way to go
On 26/10/2012, at 7:02 AM, Georg
Sounds like you need a services based approach. This is outside the scope of
tapestry.
We for example use web services and JavaEE for this type of situation.
On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:12 PM, George Christman wrote:
> We currently have one box doing all the work which is probably less than
> idea
We currently have one box doing all the work which is probably less than
ideal. I really never gave it a thought to use AWS or a VPS to do the image
processing. I have an image processing service within my T5 app, how would
you tell tapestry to use a different server to handle this, or is my
thinki
Who do you guys recommend for VPS? I'd rather get out of owning my own box.
Our current hosting cost is 350/mo for a 2 space rack. This includes a 45mb
pipe, but does not include hardware cost.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Hosting-Tapestry-App-on-Clou
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:47:45 -0200, George Christman
wrote:
We seem to be pushing our processor limits while
processing photo's at peak times of the day, so I was looking for an
affordable way to scale the processors at those times of the day.
Why, at least for now, don't you use AWS or a V
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:30:24 -0200, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
If you are not expecting exploding growth, I wouldn't move onto a
cloud platform. It's difficult to beat the price/performance ratio of
a VPS/dedicated platform. You really need to have some traffic on the
system before you need the ou
Hi Kalle, my app "CarDaddy.com, a vehicle classified app", in its current
state does around 20/30 thousand unique visitors /mo and approximately 2000
vehicle postings a month. We have been seeing pretty consistent growth over
the past few months. We seem to be pushing our processor limits while
pro
If you are not expecting exploding growth, I wouldn't move onto a
cloud platform. It's difficult to beat the price/performance ratio of
a VPS/dedicated platform. You really need to have some traffic on the
system before you need the out-scalability for a reasonably well
implemented Tapestry app.
O
14 matches
Mail list logo