By the way. This happens regardless, if I have t:context on the form or not.
Adam
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Adam Zimowski wrote:
> Hi again. I hate to interrupt the mutliple database discussion, but I
> would like to ask a question regarding the original topic on this
> thread.
>
>
Hi again. I hate to interrupt the mutliple database discussion, but I
would like to ask a question regarding the original topic on this
thread.
So, per Thiago's suggestion I tried loop with multiple form
components, and I have an issue in that if I submit one row (one form)
with invalid input
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:59:38 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
Op 28-2-2011 1:08, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schreef:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:35 -0300, Tom van Dijk
wrote:
the list of "A" items. I very quickly ran into problems with the
combination of nested zones, loops, forms and actions
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:59:38 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
Op 28-2-2011 1:08, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schreef:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:35 -0300, Tom van Dijk
wrote:
the list of "A" items. I very quickly ran into problems with the
combination of nested zones, loops, forms and actions
Op 28-2-2011 1:08, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schreef:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:35 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
the list of "A" items. I very quickly ran into problems with the
combination of nested zones, loops, forms and actions, partially
because the client IDs of the zones and forms ten
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 19:42:35 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
the list of "A" items. I very quickly ran into problems with the
combination of nested zones, loops, forms and actions, partially because
the client IDs of the zones and forms tended to change and after I
edited something, the page wa
Op 27-2-2011 14:13, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schreef:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:47:06 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
What exactly makes you bang your head?
Just the fact that I can't get my head around this thing.
I'm still curious to know more about it.
Well, what I want is very simple, the
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:47:06 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
What exactly makes you bang your head?
Just the fact that I can't get my head around this thing.
I'm still curious to know more about it.
And writer's block. Every time I type a few lines of code, I want to do
something else, like d
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:41:46 -0300, Jonathan Barker
wrote:
The documentation has improved immensely, and the quality of help on the
list is amazing. This has not been a single-guru project for quite some
time :-)
Thanks you for saying that. Tapestry hasn't been a one-man shown for at
lea
Op 26-2-2011 22:43, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schreef:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:40:21 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
My Multiple database support version of Tapestry is still working and
being updated every few days. I just need to find time to promote it
and document it on the developer mail l
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:40:21 -0300, Tom van Dijk wrote:
My Multiple database support version of Tapestry is still working and
being updated every few days. I just need to find time to promote it and
document it on the developer mail list I suppose. Right now I'm banging
my head against Tap
My Multiple database support version of Tapestry is still working and
being updated every few days. I just need to find time to promote it and
document it on the developer mail list I suppose. Right now I'm banging
my head against Tapestry's JS/AJAX/Rendering concepts that won't stick
into my h
Preface:
I've been around since the alpha days of T4, and I try to keep up my reading
on the list, but I usually only pop my head to contribute up when something
is painfully familiar - like security manager issues with Tomcat on Debian,
or the occasional Spring issues. I'm associated with a coup
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:25:23 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
Okay, I will use loop instead. Thank you for suggestion. Just wanted
to make sure I did not miss anything with Grid.
You're welcome! :) Grid is more focused on showing objects, not editing.
On the other hand, we could create another
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:56:45 -0300, Jonathan Barker
wrote:
It's not so much that Tapestry is rigid, because it is incredibly
flexible, but knowing how to flex it is the challenge. I've spent lots
of time trying to figure out the RIGHT (TM) way to do something when it
feels like it
shou
I don't think there's an easy way to do one per row, but I have used a form
in one cell per row, and I also used an in-place editor component to allow
item-by-item editing within a grid - but any row-wise validation was
completely manual.
It's not so much that Tapestry is rigid, because it is incr
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:28:31 -0300, Adam Zimowski
wrote:
Is it possible to have a grid with one form for each row?
I don't think so. In this case, can you use Loop instead?
For the errors outside Form part: I've never tried that, but Form has a
tracker parameter. It's type is ValidationT
17 matches
Mail list logo
