That's also possible. I could do that and then render... hmm...
Christian.
On 8-May-09, at 03:18 , Otho wrote:
Is html input mandatory? Id not, how about using bbcode or some wiki
markup
language?
2009/5/7 Christian Edward Gruber
Yeah - I don't, at least not yet. I probably will use su
Is html input mandatory? Id not, how about using bbcode or some wiki markup
language?
2009/5/7 Christian Edward Gruber
> Yeah - I don't, at least not yet. I probably will use such an editor
> later, but I need a protected output system so I'm not using
> since that's quite dangerous when writi
Yeah - I don't, at least not yet. I probably will use such an editor
later, but I need a protected output system so I'm not using
since that's quite dangerous when writing from a
database. I want ot make sure that even if bad data got in, it can't
come out as an XSS attack or something.
Cool; I tend to do a lot of that from Ruby, using Hpricot.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Martin Strand
wrote:
> If you need to parse html input, from a rich text editor, a remote website,
> uploaded documents, etc, I would recommend nekohtml:
> http://nekohtml.sourceforge.net/
>
> It cleans up
If you need to parse html input, from a rich text editor, a remote website,
uploaded documents, etc, I would recommend nekohtml:
http://nekohtml.sourceforge.net/
It cleans up broken html and you can easily add a filter to only allow certain
tags:
http://nekohtml.sourceforge.net/filters.html
Mar
I'd tend to do this on the other end, if possible; parse user input
(or RSS feed, or whatever) into XML and transform out the content you
don't like, then store that in DB or render it raw.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Christian Edward Gruber
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was considering how to write