Thank you all.
It seems that Tapestry, Spring and Hibernate is the best option for us.
I appreciate all the help.
Dan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Tapestry-Spring-Hibernate stack is good - although it may take some
time to get it right (depending on the complexity of your app).
We use this stack in our project and one of the prime factors for
including Spring here is its convenient transaction-management
support. It gets much better
Just to add to the flood of options...
A while ago a put together an application with tutorial/notes style docs
that lightly covers Tapestry 4, HiveMind, Cayenne (similar to Hibernate),
Maven build tool and Tomcat. It shows how to configure and get started with
these frameworks.
http://sourcefo
Would it be easier to just stick with Tapestry and Hibernate?
If you are worried about having to dive into several new frameworks
simultaneously imho Tapestry+iBatis would be great starter. Though iBatis is
not an ORM like hibernate, but it'll take you one day to start using it to
get read of al
Yes. I have had this too, especially on projects that have a full test
suite. It's great. :)
On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 19:33 +0200, Marilen Corciovei wrote:
> What I think is also very important is not only that you develop fast
> but that you can maintain your code even years after the initial
> deve
What I think is also very important is not only that you develop fast
but that you can maintain your code even years after the initial
development. As I recently found myself with a 1.5 years old tapestry
code it was still extremely clear to me where to find and modify
everything.
Len
www.len.ro
Tapestry, Hibernate, and Spring is a great combination. We use them
extensively here in a number of applications and have had a great deal
of success with them. They complement each other very well. Although
Tapestry uses hivemind you can still easily use Spring to manage your
application state as
Daniel Tabuenca a écrit :
While
hivemind and spring share many features in the wire-your-beans up
department spring's has many additional features unrelated to bean
wiring (such as Acegi Security for example).
If I can add that with Spring, you can manage operation transaction
within configurat
The tapestry-acegi allows you to use Acegi's @Secured annotation
(declarative security) in Tapestry without the Spring container.
On 1/12/07, Daniel Tabuenca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am very happy using Tapestry for the WEB portion of my application
and Spring 2.0 to wire up and configure m
I am very happy using Tapestry for the WEB portion of my application
and Spring 2.0 to wire up and configure my beans and do all the other
stuff spring does. I especially like using spring with the Spring
Annotations addon. There is some overlap between Tapestry and Spring
in that tapestry uses it
Also check out the .NET version of Maverick.
On 1/12/07, Maldonado, Daniel CW2 NGCT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After playing with C# and .NET for a while our group has decided that we need
some Java web apps to make our applicatons "enterprise" friendly and to get
buy-in from our peers who ref
11 matches
Mail list logo
