erSide.com yesterday about
this very topic:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=40581
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Matèrn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:28 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate...
One question,
If I
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:28 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate...
One question,
If I retrieve an object from my DAO and change something in that
object without doing a session.update(...), the change will be
persisted (to the DB). Is this the way it s
One question,
If I retrieve an object from my DAO and change something in that
object without doing a session.update(...), the change will be
persisted (to the DB). Is this the way it should work (not having to
do a manual update) ?
public Product getProduct()
{
Product product;
Henri,
http://www.carmanconsulting.com/svn/public/
James, I'm also very greatful. Thanks!
On 5/24/06, Henri Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi James,
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 2. Taperate now has support for three types of property persistence,
> reattach-
--Original Message-
From: Henri Dupre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:18 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate...
Hi James,
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 2. Taperate now has support for three type
Hi James,
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2. Taperate now has support for three types of property persistence,
reattach-merge (used to be called "entity"), reattach-lock, and
reattach-update, corresponding to the three different types of reattach
strategies. You can choo
ay 24, 2006 9:36 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate...
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No problem! Just to be clear about why your situation is working now, I
> removed the transaction interceptor from the persistence strategies and
the
&g
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No problem! Just to be clear about why your situation is working now, I
removed the transaction interceptor from the persistence strategies and the
"squeezer." With transaction-per-request turned on, these features work
just fine. You can di
it just go by without
rolling back the transaction and without throwing an exception. I'll try to
figure that out.
-Original Message-
From: Massimo Lusetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:08 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: New version of Tapernate..
On 5/24/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First of all, no I have not moved Tapernate as of yet. But, I wanted to let
you know about a few new features...
Thanks James!
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
-
To
10 matches
Mail list logo
