RE: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-05 Thread Mark Stang
Switch to Gentoo and have a current system. :-). -Original Message- From: Josh Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 9/3/2006 1:44 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1 ROFL! that's the best response e

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread D&J Gredler
Good deal. I've seen a couple of garden gnome ads on gmail when I've been viewing emails on this list about trolling and trolls :-) On 9/4/06, Josh Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It worked like a charm, Daniel! I would have responded earlier but I was too busy playing with my shiny new compo

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread Josh Long
It worked like a charm, Daniel! I would have responded earlier but I was too busy playing with my shiny new component.. The code below is magic, nothing less. It works with ajax, exposes all the properties to edit that I want, has validation, and supports all the intrinsically tapestry 4.1 featu

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Hehe...I have to admit - as much as I love programming with the exceptionally good Qt toolkit - I like using the gnome desktop much more than KDE :) On 9/3/06, Josh Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ROFL! that's the best response ever!! I'm sorry about your awkward weekend though! So you get to

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread D&J Gredler
You didn't feel bad for breaking my BeanForm?!? Shame on you! ;-) On 9/3/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Horrible weekend so far...I've spent it working on anything but what I want. (which is tapestry obviously)..First client project, then fixing old wounds in maven2...Then happily

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread D&J Gredler
Hi Josh, Unless I'm mistaken, I think the problem you're having is that Form's "direct" parameter was removed in 4.1. In case you didn't know, in Tapestry 4.0, if you had direct=false, the whole page was submitted and rewound when the form was submitted. If you had direct=true, only the Form comp

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread Josh Long
Ow.. that was a depressing run at nabble. Gotta stop nabbl'ing after midnight. Nothing good comes of it.. So it was an ognl issue, eh? http://www.nabble.com/BeanForm-Move-tf1921926.html#a5262830 I'm not scared of ognl... much... Josh On 9/3/06, Josh Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ROFL! tha

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread Josh Long
ROFL! that's the best response ever!! I'm sorry about your awkward weekend though! So you get to upgrade linux and I'm stuck on SuSe 9.2 or 3. Seems like everyones updating without me. But I will not be jealous. It doesn't suit me. I finally uninstalled Red Hat 9 at best a year ago.. thought tha

Re: I'm trying to get the marvelous BeanForm component working with tap 4.1

2006-09-03 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
Horrible weekend so far...I've spent it working on anything but what I want. (which is tapestry obviously)..First client project, then fixing old wounds in maven2...Then happily upgraded to edgy eft (sweet!) . I think Daniel mentioned I broke his beanform at some point, but I don't remember how I