ent: Friday, December 08, 2006 9:45 PM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately I'm stuck with JDK 1.4 since our appserver is Websphere 5.1 :-(
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMA
Nice, I will give this a shot!
Thanks,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dennis Sinelnikov
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 9:45 PM
To: users@tapestry.apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Unfortunately
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately I'm stuck with JDK 1.4 since our appserver is Websphere 5.1 :-(
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:34 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
Not if yo
L PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately I'm stuck with JDK 1.4 since our appserver is Websphere 5.1 :-(
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:34 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
Unfortunately I'm stuck with JDK 1.4 since our appserver is Websphere 5.1 :-(
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:34 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
Not if you use annotations. Unlik
2006 3:27 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
You can have it "injected" into something via a .page/.jwc file by
doing something like:
(http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/usersguide/state.html) or you
use an annotation to do the same:
@InjectState
So every .page file needs this? :o
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
You can have it "injected" into something via a .page/.jwc file by
doing
chive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg01318.html
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
I'll have to check into that particular claim in the current
documentation to be sure
ving this object with Hivemind?
Wh
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
I'll have to check into that particular claim in the current
documentation to be
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 3:11 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Getting rid of .getVisit()
I'll have to check into that particular claim in the current
documentation to be sure. Previously I think a HashMap was created by
default but since removal of the (as of 4.0 deprecated visit)
fun
I'll have to check into that particular claim in the current
documentation to be sure. Previously I think a HashMap was created by
default but since removal of the (as of 4.0 deprecated visit)
functionality all of that logic may be moot.
An easy example of doing this can be found here, you want t
11 matches
Mail list logo