: Friday, September 01, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4
I meant the "direct" part not the "engine-service:" part.
Cheers,
On 9/1/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's a HiveMind object provi
stry users'
Subject: RE: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4
It's a HiveMind object provider.
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/hivedocs/service/tapestry.serv
ices.EngineServiceObjectProvider.html
-Original Message-
From: Hajaansh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
tProvider.html
-Original Message-
From: Hajaansh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 7:21 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4
Perfect.
Where did you find that the name for the engine service was
engine-service:direct ?
On 9/1/0
From the tapestry users mailing list, where else . . . !
/Brian.
On 9/1/06, Hajaansh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perfect.
Where did you find that the name for the engine service was
engine-service:direct ?
On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hajaansh,
>
> had the same prob
t: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4
Perfect.
Where did you find that the name for the engine service was
engine-service:direct ?
On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hajaansh,
>
> had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the
>
Perfect.
Where did you find that the name for the engine service was
engine-service:direct ?
On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hajaansh,
had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the
updated
AreaLink.jwc and AreaLink.java that I use. The main difference
Hajaansh,
had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the updated
AreaLink.jwc and AreaLink.java that I use. The main difference in the use of
property injection for the engine service.
AreaLink.jwc
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";>
Creates a
