Re: Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3

2011-10-31 Thread Peter Stavrinides
28:36 GMT +02:00 Athens, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3 I suspect Tapestry is not recognizing that SubClass.onSuccessFromStep1() is an override of BaseClass.onSuccessFromStep1() (perhaps the abstract flag is throwing it). So, Tapestry builds code for Ba

Re: Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3

2011-10-27 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
issues when I need to return an Object. > > cheers, > Peter > > - Original Message - > From: "Peter Stavrinides" > To: "Tapestry Mailing List" > Sent: Thursday, 27 October, 2011 13:11:35 GMT +02:00 Athens, Bucharest, > Istanbul > Subjec

Re: Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3

2011-10-27 Thread Peter Stavrinides
" To: "Tapestry Mailing List" Sent: Thursday, 27 October, 2011 13:11:35 GMT +02:00 Athens, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3 Hi all, We noticed some odd behaviour today in one of our apps, it appears when we use the pattern detailed below, the onSucc

Possible regression Tapestry 5.1 to 5.3

2011-10-27 Thread Peter Stavrinides
Hi all, We noticed some odd behaviour today in one of our apps, it appears when we use the pattern detailed below, the onSuccessFromStep1() event gets invoked twice by Tapestry, this was not the case in 5.1: public abstract class BaseClass { public abstract Object onSuccessFromStep1(); } p