www.arsmachina.com.br
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:04:55 -0300, Juan Isern wrote:
I think that I'm needing something more powerful than that, because I'd
need to process the complete component tree in one single step in a
single place in the code.
That's exactly the component model that Tapestry uses internally. If y
forum that such information wasn't meant to be
>> directly accessed, but I think my reason is rather compelling...
>>
>> Thanks and regards
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in conte
d regards
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Page-component-tree-model-tp29090350p29090350.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
&
to be
directly accessed, but I think my reason is rather compelling...
Thanks and regards
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Page-component-tree-model-tp29090350p29090350.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
