Re: Ognl issues in tapestry 4.1.6

2009-05-15 Thread Howard.Kelsey
Hi So after much debugging I found that: 1.Our class is available in the WebappClassLoader because classLoader.loadClass(“com.algorithmics.opvantage.model.domain.Event”) returns the class. The problem is that the bytecode enhancement for ongl uses javassist to find the class and if the cl

Re: Ognl issues in tapestry 4.1.6

2009-05-13 Thread Howard.Kelsey
Hi Our domain classes are generated/compiled at startup time to support client data model. These are simple pojos with getters and setters for each property. The class is definitely available because content.domain.startDate, content.domain.getStartDate(), content.domain[‘startDate’] all work,

Re: Ognl issues in tapestry 4.1.6

2009-05-12 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
It would be helpful to see the Domain class. Perhaps there's an overloaded method that's confusing the OGNL code. As you can see, it's trying to generate bytecode for your expression, but failing for some reason. Classloader issues can get very tricky inside this kind of code. On Tue, May 12, 2009

Ognl issues in tapestry 4.1.6

2009-05-12 Thread Howard.Kelsey
Hi Ognl in 4.1.6 is behaving rather strangely(I believe this must be a bug)! We're trying to upgrade from 4.0.2. Here's a simplified version of what's happening in an insert component. value="ognl:content.domain['startDate']" renders correctly however value="ognl:content.domain[sharedPickerPro

Re: OGNL issues

2007-05-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
P.S. You're much more likely to get a working fix if you provide enough information in your report for me to re-produce exactly the same method calls /object structure. Doesn't have to be a "component" per say, just need to know method signatures / types on everything. On 5/2/07, Jesse Kuhnert <[

Re: OGNL issues

2007-05-02 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
A fix can probably be made later tonight if you file an issue here: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL On 5/2/07, Lionel Touati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, I'm still having issues with OGNL with the latest OGNL / TAP ( out of SVN) combination. This simple invocation for example

OGNL issues

2007-05-02 Thread Lionel Touati
Hi All, I'm still having issues with OGNL with the latest OGNL / TAP ( out of SVN) combination. This simple invocation for example: ognl:getCell(column,row).fareType.name()+'_icone' always fails with the following exception nable to read OGNL _expression_ '' of [EMAIL PROTECTED]: target is