On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:39:40 -0200, sthomps wrote:
Thiago,
Hi!
Your assumption is correct.
:)
I'm not saying right or wrong either way on how Tapestry handles this -
it's just different from how Wicket handles it and something I have to
be aware of.
In this case, I'd say Wicket has
Thiago,
Your assumption is correct.
I'm not saying right or wrong either way on how Tapestry handles this - it's
just different from how Wicket handles it and something I have to be aware
of.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Fo
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:16:43 -0200, mailingl...@j-b-s.de
wrote:
To me it sounds like you need dividing all your form parts into
components and on a per page basis you have only one form containing
1..n of your components. I do not see the point why all your components
have to be forms. T
gt; View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp5719332p5719362.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
> To unsub
eed to be
aware of.
Wicket Nested Forms <https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/nested-forms.html>
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp5719332p5719362.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list
form and validation is
> done with the use of FormSupport and ValidationTracker?
>
> I would like the sub-form to be able to contain a submit button/submit link
> that only acts on that sub-form.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http:
e form and validation is
done with the use of FormSupport and ValidationTracker?
I would like the sub-form to be able to contain a submit button/submit link
that only acts on that sub-form.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp57193
;
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp5719332p5719339.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---
like what I want to accomplish is feasible. I'll just need to
code it out.
Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp5719332p5719339.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archiv
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:01:22 -0200, sthomps wrote:
No form fragments don't appear to be what I would need.
I'm still finding my way around Tapestry so I'll try and explain a bit
better in how I use Wicket with nested forms.
I would like to have a parent form that on submit will validate all t
can be validated on it's own - only that info related to the nested form is
submitted and validated.
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Nested-Form-Support-tp5719332p5719334.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing l
> I wanted to confirm that there is not nested form support in Tapestry 5?
>
> I'm currently evaluating Tapestry coming from Wicket and I use nested forms
> quite often.
>
> It's nice to be able to componentize a form, include it as needed among
> other forms/pages, and
I wanted to confirm that there is not nested form support in Tapestry 5?
I'm currently evaluating Tapestry coming from Wicket and I use nested forms
quite often.
It's nice to be able to componentize a form, include it as needed among
other forms/pages, and have a validation chain from
13 matches
Mail list logo
