t; wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I grepped over the tapestry-core sources for "javax.xml.stream" and
>>>>> only
>>>>> found them imported in TemplateParser and StaxTemplateParser.
>>>>> Would it then be sufficient to just contribute
With plain Stax I still get the same error in TemplateParser. Maybe I
will try to switch back to the 5.0.18 one when I have time.
Cheers,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2643391.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users maili
sing Woodstox (maybe the one from 5.0.1.8)?
>>>
>>>
>>> I just tried to eliminate Woodstox and to use "pure" Stax API for
>>> template parsing. This wasn't that difficult (see
>>> http://derkoe.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/tapestry-51-wood
tried to eliminate Woodstox and to use "pure" Stax API
for template parsing. This wasn't that difficult (see http://derkoe.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/tapestry-51-woodstox/)
.
With plain Stax I still get the same error in TemplateParser.
Maybe I will try to switch back to the 5.0.18
"pure" Stax API for
template parsing. This wasn't that difficult (see
http://derkoe.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/tapestry-51-woodstox/).
With plain Stax I still get the same error in TemplateParser. Maybe
I will try to switch back to the 5.0.18 one when I have time.
Cheers,
Chris
--
1.8)?
I just tried to eliminate Woodstox and to use "pure" Stax API for
template parsing. This wasn't that difficult (see http://derkoe.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/tapestry-51-woodstox/)
.
With plain Stax I still get the same error in TemplateParser.
Maybe I will try to switch back
k to the 5.0.18 one when I have time.
Cheers,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2643391.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
I will use gae to build some small app.It's free.
2009/4/17 Otho
> Yes, the missing referential integrity, the (factual) need to duplicate
> data
> over multiple classes for fast reads and the resulting necessity to
> manually
> cascade writing operations will be a pita for most applications.
>
>
Yes, the missing referential integrity, the (factual) need to duplicate data
over multiple classes for fast reads and the resulting necessity to manually
cascade writing operations will be a pita for most applications.
2009/4/17 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Ot
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Otho wrote:
> In how far shoult GAE be a showstopper for anything? It is neither the
> promised land, nor some gift from the gods. I would rather find it a
> showstopper, if shady compromises were made just to cater to a somewhat
> castrated platform which is actua
In how far shoult GAE be a showstopper for anything? It is neither the
promised land, nor some gift from the gods. I would rather find it a
showstopper, if shady compromises were made just to cater to a somewhat
castrated platform which is actually only beneficial, if you should happen
to have the
Well, I did, but I wasn't allowed to say anything. ;p
Christian.
On 16-Apr-09, at 23:58 , Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Em Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:42:45 -0300, Alex Kotchnev
escreveu:
I'm not sure about everyone else, but for me this is a BIG issue and
is one of the reasons holding me
Em Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:42:45 -0300, Alex Kotchnev
escreveu:
I'm not sure about everyone else, but for me this is a BIG issue and
is one of the reasons holding me back from moving my app to the 5.1
beta. Most likely I'll hold off on upgrading to 5.1 final if it
doesn't support GAE.
The funny
ack to the 5.0.18 one when I have time.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2643391.html
> Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
en I have time.
Cheers,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2643391.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsub
vided a working project.
Cheers,
Chris
Jun Tsai
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2631509.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
rk on GAE - there seems to be a
problem with
the Woodstox Stax2 lib.
--
Chris
http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2623431.html
Sent from the Tapestry Users mai
-
>> Chris
>> http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2623431.html
>> Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> --
lib.
>
> --
> Chris
> http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2623431.html
> Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
; wrote:
>
>>
>> I have Tapestry 5.0.18 working: http://tapestry-mail.appspot.com/
>>
>> Tapestry 5.1.0.2 does not work on GAE - there seems to be a problem with
>> the Woodstox Stax2 lib.
>>
>> --
>> Chris
>> http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
&
not work on GAE - there seems to be a problem with
> the Woodstox Stax2 lib.
>
> --
> Chris
> http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngine-tp2605876p2623431.html
> Sent from the
I have Tapestry 5.0.18 working: http://tapestry-mail.appspot.com/
Tapestry 5.1.0.2 does not work on GAE - there seems to be a problem with the
Woodstox Stax2 lib.
--
Chris
http://derkoe.wordpress.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google
-----
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-AppEngi
---
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Java-support-added-to-Google-A
Oh, I'll be blogging.
Christian.
On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Christian Edward Gruber
wrote:
I'm already on it.
Nice! Please post your impressions here or at a blog. :)
--
Thiago
---
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Christian Edward Gruber
wrote:
> I'm already on it.
Nice! Please post your impressions here or at a blog. :)
--
Thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additi
I'm already on it.
Christian.
On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday it was announced that the Google AppEngine now supports Java
applications. Some libraries are already supported, others not.
JavaMail is supported, Hibernate isn't, JPA is, JSF supppo
Hi!
Yesterday it was announced that the Google AppEngine now supports Java
applications. Some libraries are already supported, others not.
JavaMail is supported, Hibernate isn't, JPA is, JSF suppport is
unknown. Will anyone volunteer to test Tapestry there? :-)
http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
28 matches
Mail list logo
