"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2009 17:57:20 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
Peter Stavrinides wrote:
> I use an ASO as a token when signing users in, I use this small method
> to
Peter Stavrinides wrote:
I use an ASO as a token when signing users in, I use this small method
to introduce a time delay (if there are multiple failed attempts, I
increase the delay):
It would be an option to store server side when a person/system is
allowed another try to login and assure all
e.hal...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-11-09 10:32 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
What happens in a clustered environment?
Tapestry services aren't part of normal HTTP session clustering.
Olle
2009/2/11 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> O
;Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2009 15:07:33 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: RE: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
Hello,
I am not him:)(if that makes sense:) but I am doing the same thing right
now.
I am using the database not to slow c
._lastcheck = lastcheck;
}
}
Thanks,
--James
-Original Message-
From: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-11-09 9:18 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ulrich Stärk wr
What happens in a clustered environment?
Tapestry services aren't part of normal HTTP session clustering.
Olle
2009/2/11 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> > Something like a singleton tapestry service with an access-synchronized
> map
>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Something like a singleton tapestry service with an access-synchronized map
> inside maybe?
That's what I'd do.
James: sorry for mistaking your message as someone else's. :)
--
Thiago
--
thiag...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-11-09 8:52 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM, James Sherwood
wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
Doesn't most dictionary style attacks create a new request each time
therefore creating
reate an application wide map(object) in T5?
Sorry for kind of hijacking your thread Peter:)
--James
-Original Message-
From: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-11-09 8:52 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in a
Paula Figueiredo [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com]
Sent: February-11-09 8:14 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Peter Stavrinides
wrote:
> I use an ASO as a token when signing users in, I use this small method to
int
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM, James Sherwood
wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> Doesn't most dictionary style attacks create a new request each time
> therefore creating a new ASO? Kind of like closing your browser and
> reopening it each time?
They are done by bots (programs), not people, so I guess yo
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Peter Stavrinides
wrote:
> I use an ASO as a token when signing users in, I use this small method to
> introduce a time delay (if there are multiple failed attempts, I increase the
> delay):
Your code doesn't delay the ASO, it delays the request processing. ;)
I
ry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 11 February, 2009 13:04:17 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: IoC question - introducing a time delay in an ASO
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Peter Stavrinides
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi!
> What are the effects of using T
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Peter Stavrinides
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi!
> What are the effects of using Thread.sleep(myInterval) in an ASO? My
> understanding is that each user receives a separate instance of the ASO, but
> not
> necessarily on a separate thread, right?
Each user receive
Hi everyone,
What are the effects of using Thread.sleep(myInterval) in an ASO? My
understanding is that each user receives a separate instance of the ASO, but
not necessarily on a separate thread, right?
If this is true then what happens after Thread.sleep is active, and the next
user asks for
15 matches
Mail list logo
