On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Christopher Dodunski <
chrisfromtapes...@christopher.net.nz> wrote:
> Hi Chris & Bob,
>
Hello!
> I had wrongly assumed that Tapestry left the HTML markup as is, parsing
> only the t:xxx markup for 'wiring' webpage components to Java code.
>
Well, most of the ti
Hi Chris & Bob,
Thanks, yes, it's all part of the learning process. :-) Now that I know
that Tapestry ActionLink and EventLink only emit tags, I'll in future
style all my buttons as a.xxx rather than input.xxx (style.css).
I had wrongly assumed that Tapestry left the HTML markup as is, parsing
I think the EventLink component did the only thing it could reasonably be
expected to do. When you add t:type=foo to an HTML tag you're telling
Tapestry to change the tag to a foo component. In the case of
t:type=eventlink, the EventLink component emits an tag. That's the only
type of tag it knows
Hi Chris,
Yes, you were absolutely correct. Tapestry was changing my tags
to tags, and then of course the input.opto-button CSS code got totally
ignored. Modifying the CSS from 'input' to 'anchor' type wasn't so
trivial, particulary with vertically centreing button labels, which is
easy with '
I mostly use elements styled as buttons for this - A standard bootstrap
thing.
It sounds like your CSS is off if your elements disappear when rendering
them with tapestry, take a look at the generated HTML to see what is going
on. Maybe your is rendered as (It is "link" components so it
could b
This problem has proved trickier to solve than expected.
The below tag produces a displayed button, but obviously without any
functionality, as the tag contains no Tapestry-specific elements.
The problem comes on adding Tapestry markup, with the intention of
invoking a deleteUser() method in th
Thanks Geoff. Are you in Aus? Greetings from NZ.
Your tag...
...looks like it should do the trick. I assume that the t:context
parameter is optional, in this case just for passing onNextPage() a
literal string as argument?
Also, to keep the website designers happy, it might be preferable to
A working example:
http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/examples/styling/linksandsubmits1
Geoff
> On 24 Dec 2017, at 6:33 am, Christopher Dodunski
> wrote:
>
> Concerning use of the button HTML tag, I read the following...
>
> "Definition and Usage
>
> The tag defines
Concerning use of the button HTML tag, I read the following...
"Definition and Usage
The tag defines a clickable button.
Inside a element you can put content, like text or images. This
is the difference between this element and buttons created with the
element.
Tip: Always specify the type a
Oh, I thought I had tried that but the button didn't render. Hence my post.
Nevermind, I'll try it again in case the problem was elsewhere.
If ActionLink and Eventlink indeed accept 'class' parameter, it should go
easily.
Thanks,
Chris.
---
Hi,
All the link types extends AbstractLink which supports informal
parameters... So basically just add a class=""
parameter and it will pass through to the html.
--
Chris
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Christopher Dodunski <
chrisfromtapes...@christopher.net.nz> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The T
Hi all,
The Tapestry 'submit' component allows use of buttons defined in CSS by
way of the 'class' parameter. This is perfect for form buttons. But now
I want to use these same CSS buttons outside of forms. The natural choice
is Tapestry's ActionLink or EventLink component. But these component
12 matches
Mail list logo