Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-11-08 Thread Kevin Menard
Well, it took me longer than I wanted, but the patch has been applied. Thanks again. -- Kevin On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Kevin Menard wrote: > Thanks for opening TAP5-913, Dmitry.  I'll try to apply this tonight. > Unfortunately the test system for Tapestry doesn't work for Snow > Leop

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-10-29 Thread Kevin Menard
Thanks for opening TAP5-913, Dmitry. I'll try to apply this tonight. Unfortunately the test system for Tapestry doesn't work for Snow Leopard, so I have to run in a VM to verify everything is passing. -- Kevin On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Dmitry Gusev wrote: > I've made a Pull request on

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-10-28 Thread Jun Tsai
nice job 2009/10/28 Dmitry Gusev > I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError. > > Here's the commit details: > > > http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0 > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev wrote: > >

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-10-28 Thread Dmitry Gusev
I've made a Pull request on github with fixes for java.lang.VerifyError. Here's the commit details: http://github.com/dmitrygusev/tapestry5/commit/35197745d13ffed1fb89d730dbc85f750bf50bb0 On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 07:14, Alex Kotchnev wrote: > A follow up question to the committers on this : Is

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-13 Thread Alex Kotchnev
A follow up question to the committers on this : Is Jun's approach below something acceptable to do in the meantime ? I was trying to deploy a test 5.1 app to GAE and I ran into the same issue. As he indicated these methods had emtpy try-catch blocks, removing which is supposed to resolve the issue

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-07 Thread Christian Köberl
to have Tapestry running without Stax. Cheers, Chris -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Good-news-about-Tapestry-5-in-Google-App-Engine-tp3576791p3596728.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ---

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-06 Thread Robert Zeigler
There's an open issue for this (TAP5-713) and Christian Köberl has a working patch that seems to be about 98% there... two tests still fail on the command line, although they don't fail when run separately in eclipse. I may have some time to look over the patch (and the corresponding tests)

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-05 Thread Jun Tsai
deploy 5.1 application. http://ganshane.appspot.com 2009/9/5 Howard Lewis Ship > No promises, but I'd think 5.2 is quite reasonable. I'd love to straighten > this out and reduce the external dependencies that Tapestry brings in. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Kotchnev wrote: > > >

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-04 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
No promises, but I'd think 5.2 is quite reasonable. I'd love to straighten this out and reduce the external dependencies that Tapestry brings in. On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Alex Kotchnev wrote: > Howard, > thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes would be > coming i

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-04 Thread Alex Kotchnev
Howard, thanks for the quick response. Do you think that these changes would be coming into the next point release (e.g. 5.2) or are they more likely to happen further out in the future ? Cheers, Alex K On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > My intention is to remove the

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-04 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
My intention is to remove the dependencies on javax.stream and revert to a SAX parser. For reasonably sized documents such as Tapestry templates, there's no reason not to use SAX to read the whole document into a stream of tokens similar to what STAX gives you. Fortunately, the tests in this area

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-04 Thread Alex Kotchnev
A quick question for the commiters : I do recall seeing some messages about an option to remove woodstox and using plain java.xml.stream APIs. Is there a plan to integrate any of these changes into the standard build or would they remain an external module (if that's even needed w/ the GAE issue r

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-04 Thread Jun Tsai
I had manually fixed the problem.Remove some empty method body in PropertyExpressionLexer.java maked by antlr. // $ANTLR start "INTEGER" public final void mINTEGER() throws RecognitionException { } // $ANTLR end "INTEGER" // $ANTLR start "DEREF" public final void mDEREF() thr

Re: Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-03 Thread Jun Tsai
The ticket had been fixed.I had tested on GAE using 1.2.5 SDK. But when I write simple pagelink about ,some exception thrown. java.lang.VerifyError: (class: org/apache/tapestry5/internal/antlr/PropertyExpressionLexer, method: mRANGEOP signature: ()V) Stack size too large at org.apache.ta

Good news about Tapestry 5 in Google App Engine

2009-09-03 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
--- Mensagem encaminhada --- De: codesite-nore...@google.com Assunto: Issue 1277 in googleappengine: Add javax.xml.stream to whitelist Data: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 19:34:42 -0300 Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: Version-1.2.5 Comment #12 on issue 1277 by sly...@google.com: Add ja