On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:54:42 -0300, Nicolas Gillet - MARKET-IP
wrote:
The type is actually the problem.
It is actually a java.lang.String but the getter and setter on it are
defined by a generic interface :
// INTERFACE (Identifiable.java) :
public interface Identifiable {
public
s'; Nicolas Gillet - MARKET-IP
Subject: Re: Generic interface, issue in TML
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:55:30 -0300, Nicolas Gillet - MARKET-IP
wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException: Parameter
> 'translate' of component test/Gener
On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:55:30 -0300, Nicolas Gillet - MARKET-IP
wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException: Parameter
'translate' of component test/Generic:pojoid is bound to null. This
parameter is not allowed to be null. [at
classpath:com/marketip/geoplann
ian Köberl [mailto:tapestry.christian.koeb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 9:17 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Generic interface, issue in TML
Seems that your code example is not consitent. The error says there's a
component "foreignid" but in your tml there's no such fi
Hello,
Tapestry version 5.2.5
Tomacat version 6.0.32
Nicolas.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Canfield [mailto:joshcanfi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:30 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Generic interface, issue in TML
What version of tapestry?
On Jul 14, 2011 6:03 AM
2011-07-14 14:09, Support Geoplanning:
org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.util.TapestryException: Parameter
'translate' of component admin/Tasks:taskedit.taskeditform.foreignid is
bound to null. This parameter is not allowed to be null. [at
classpath:com/marketip/geoplanning/web/components/admin/T
What version of tapestry?
On Jul 14, 2011 6:03 AM, "Support Geoplanning"
wrote:
> Hello List,
>
>
>
> Not easy to summarize this issue in the title … anyway.
>
>
>
> I am facing an irritating behavior with a pojo that I want to modify in a
> form.
>
> This pojo implements a generic interface that
Hello List,
Not easy to summarize this issue in the title
anyway.
I am facing an irritating behavior with a pojo that I want to modify in a
form.
This pojo implements a generic interface that forces the implementation of a
getter and a setter.
If I try to link the value of a TextField t
