On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:59:41 -0300, Nicolas Barrera
wrote:
It's great to hear that you keep mirroring to nabble as it's a nice
archive and pretty useful for searches please do not change that.
It was never our intention to prevent Nabble to serve as a mirror of the
mailing list. It's qu
It's great to hear that you keep mirroring to nabble as it's a nice archive
and pretty useful for searches please do not change that.
cheers
Nicolás.-
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Lance Java wrote:
> Sorry, wasn't aware of the extra work it was creating. I'm happy for a
> solution that k
Sorry, wasn't aware of the extra work it was creating. I'm happy for a
solution that keeps you guys focused.
Thanks for your continued tapestry support.
Cheers,
Lance
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:42:14 -0300, Barry Books wrote:
I had not looked at that way but I think you are correct. You tried to
solve an Apache Foundation mailing list deficiency with Nabble but
Nabble has it's own set of problems.
Actually, we never tried anything with Nabble: it just started
I had not looked at that way but I think you are correct. You tried to
solve an Apache Foundation mailing list deficiency with Nabble but
Nabble has it's own set of problems.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:46:42 -0300, Barry Books w
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:46:42 -0300, Barry Books wrote:
I understand that which is why I said the Apache policy (not the
Tapestry policy) is outdated. If the Apache Foundation had a gateway
anyone could post thru then perhaps most of the issues would be
resolved.
Again this is not a complaint b
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> On 22.03.2013 13:43, Barry Books wrote:
>> Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
>> I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
>> me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache
On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:47:03 -0300, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
2. There is no real built in archive system which makes web searches a
problem. Nabble is considered a hosting site and hosting sites are
blocked by my work firewall.
tapestry.markmail.org - excellent searching and filtering capabilities
On 22.03.2013 13:43, Barry Books wrote:
> Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
> I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
> me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache mailing list
> policy but I think it's outdated. To me it
Not a complaint about the Tapestry list (or PMC members) but I though
I voice my opinion about the policy to see if there are others like
me. I think I understand the reasoning behind the Apache mailing list
policy but I think it's outdated. To me it has two problems.
1. I cannot participate in th
Uli, this is the first time I've heard that you had to moderate Nabble
posts. Sorry to hear that. I withdraw my objection.
On Mar 22, 2013 5:27 AM, "Ulrich Stärk" wrote:
> First, Nabble users don't subscribe, meaning I have to moderate Nabble
> mails on a daily basis.
> Nabble won't or can't forc
First, Nabble users don't subscribe, meaning I have to moderate Nabble mails on
a daily basis.
Nabble won't or can't force users to subscribe users prior to posting.
Second, Nabble eats code listings etc. leaving users to wonder why their emails
aren't displayed
properly to "normal" users, possi
Yeah, I 'm with you, Lance. And I didn't think the annoyances of the nabble
posts were significant.
On Mar 21, 2013 7:06 PM, "Lance Java" wrote:
> That's actually really annoying for me.
>
> Most workplaces don't allow personal email but they do allow Nabble. Sure I
> can always use my phone but
That's actually really annoying for me.
Most workplaces don't allow personal email but they do allow Nabble. Sure I
can always use my phone but writing code and copy / paste etc is really
annoying on a phone.
On 21 March 2013 16:31, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Due to many heada
Hi!
Due to many headaches we're having with posts from Nabble (including
swallowing of code), we decided to not allow them anymore. People, please
remember: this isn't a forum, it never was a forum, this is a mailing
list, and Apache Foundation projects must use mailing lists as the
offic
15 matches
Mail list logo
